IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/abacus/v61y2025i2p273-303.html

The Valuation Differences between Operating and Finance Lease Liabilities in US Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Devon Erickson
  • Bradley P. Lindsey
  • Jayson Talakai

Abstract

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016‐02, which effectively requires the capitalization of all leases longer than one year. However, due to concerns that leasing classifications capture economic differences among leases, the new standard maintains separate classifications of operating and finance leases on the balance sheet, and the bright‐line tests required under SFAS 13 effectively remain. In this paper, we shed light on the FASB's decision to maintain lease classifications in the new leasing standard by examining the relative valuation implications of operating and finance lease liabilities under ASU 2016‐02 and whether these valuation coefficients changed under this new standard. We find that the valuation coefficient on operating lease liabilities differs from that on finance lease liabilities, suggesting that separately reporting these lease liabilities provides value‐relevant information. We also examine the relative valuation implications of as‐if‐capitalized operating lease liabilities and finance lease liabilities under SFAS 13, and we again find that the valuation coefficients differ across these lease classifications, suggesting that the FASB's decision to retain these classifications preserved value‐relevant information used by investors under SFAS 13. Finally, we find that the valuation coefficient on operating lease liabilities increased under ASU 2016‐02 relative to under SFAS 13, consistent with the incomplete revelation hypothesis (Bloomfield, 2002). Our paper reinforces the importance of separating operating and finance lease liabilities to provide useful information for valuation and supports the FASB's decision to maintain separate lease liability classifications under ASU 2016‐02.

Suggested Citation

  • Devon Erickson & Bradley P. Lindsey & Jayson Talakai, 2025. "The Valuation Differences between Operating and Finance Lease Liabilities in US Firms," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 61(2), pages 273-303, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:61:y:2025:i:2:p:273-303
    DOI: 10.1111/abac.12333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/abac.12333
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/abac.12333?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ely, Km, 1995. "Operating Lease Accounting And The Markets Assessment Of Equity Risk," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(2), pages 397-415.
    2. Fama, Eugene F, 1970. "Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 25(2), pages 383-417, May.
    3. Jennifer Altamuro & Rick Johnston & Shailendra (Shail) Pandit & Haiwen (Helen) Zhang, 2014. "Operating Leases and Credit Assessments," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(2), pages 551-580, June.
    4. Mary E. Barth & William H. Beaver & John R. M. Hand & Wayne R. Landsman, 1999. "Accruals, Cash Flows, and Equity Values," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 4(3), pages 205-229, December.
    5. Aboody, David & Barth, Mary E. & Kasznik, Ron, 1999. "Revaluations of fixed assets and future firm performance: Evidence from the UK1," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(1-3), pages 149-178, January.
    6. Aboody, David, 1996. "Market valuation of employee stock options," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1-3), pages 357-391, October.
    7. Begoña Giner & Francisca Pardo, 2018. "The Value Relevance of Operating Lease Liabilities: Economic Effects of IFRS 16," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(4), pages 496-511, December.
    8. Lim, Steve C. & Mann, Steven C. & Mihov, Vassil T., 2017. "Do operating leases expand credit capacity? Evidence from borrowing costs and credit ratings," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 100-114.
    9. Imhoff, E.A. & Thomas, J.K., 1988. "Economic Consequences Of Accounting Standards: The Lease Disclosure Rule Change," Papers fb-_88-36, Columbia - Graduate School of Business.
    10. repec:bla:jfinan:v:53:y:1998:i:1:p:131-162 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Barth, Mary E. & Beaver, William H. & Landsman, Wayne R., 1992. "The market valuation implications of net periodic pension cost components," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 27-62, March.
    12. Imhoff, Eugene Jr. & Thomas, Jacob K., 1988. "Economic consequences of accounting standards : The lease disclosure rule change," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 277-310, December.
    13. Barth, Mary E. & Beaver, William H. & Landsman, Wayne R., 1998. "Relative valuation roles of equity book value and net income as a function of financial health," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 1-34, February.
    14. Smith, Clifford W, Jr & Wakeman, L MacDonald, 1985. "Determinants of Corporate Leasing Policy," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 40(3), pages 895-908, July.
    15. El-Gazzar, Samir & Lilien, Steve & Pastena, Victor, 1986. "Accounting for leases by lessees," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 217-237, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Shanshan & Liu, Chang, 2020. "State ownership and the structuring of lease arrangements," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    2. Begoña Giner & Francisca Pardo, 2018. "The Value Relevance of Operating Lease Liabilities: Economic Effects of IFRS 16," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 28(4), pages 496-511, December.
    3. Audrey Hsu & Sophia Liu, 2025. "Recognition versus disclosure and stock price crash risk: Evidence from IFRS 16 adoption," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 749-776, August.
    4. Petrus Ferreira & Wayne R. Landsman & Brian Rountree, 2026. "Capital Structure Effects Associated with the New Lease Accounting Standard," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(4), pages 3611-3628, April.
    5. Jacques Sarremejeanne, 2011. "Les déterminants financiers des cessions-bail," Post-Print hal-00650571, HAL.
    6. Ma, Mark (Shuai) & Thomas, Wayne B., 2023. "Economic consequences of operating lease recognition," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(2).
    7. Chen, Ciao-Wei & Correia, Maria & Urcan, Oktay, 2023. "Accounting for leases and corporate investment," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117182, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Jonas Heese & Albert Shin & Charles C. Y. Wang, 2025. "Variable leases under ASC 842: first evidence on properties and consequences," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 2218-2263, September.
    9. Lin Qiu & Joshua Ronen, 2025. "Anticipatory effects of accounting standards: the lease exposure draft," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 1543-1591, June.
    10. Sylvain Durocher, 2008. "Canadian Evidence on the Constructive Capitalization of Operating Leases," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(3), pages 227-256, August.
    11. Sarah L. C. Zechman, 2010. "The Relation Between Voluntary Disclosure and Financial Reporting: Evidence from Synthetic Leases," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 48(3), pages 725-765, June.
    12. Jung, Taejin & Scarlat, Elvira, 2024. "The effect of ASC 842 leases on bond yields," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).
    13. Kim, Tae-Nyun & Xie, Yutong, 2023. "Off-balance sheet disclosure and leverage adjustment speed," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    14. Barth, Mary E. & Beaver, William H. & Landsman, Wayne R., 2001. "The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 77-104, September.
    15. Kusano, Masaki, 2018. "Effect of capitalizing operating leases on credit ratings: Evidence from Japan," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 45-56.
    16. Kusano, Masaki, 2020. "Does recognition versus disclosure affect risk relevance? Evidence from finance leases in Japan," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    17. Diamant, Olga, 2010. "Leasing und bilanzpolitische Motive," Leasing - Wissenschaft & Praxis, Universität zu Köln, Forschungsinstitut für Leasing, vol. 8(2), pages 7-32.
    18. Lim, Steve C. & Mann, Steven C. & Mihov, Vassil T., 2017. "Do operating leases expand credit capacity? Evidence from borrowing costs and credit ratings," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 100-114.
    19. Fitó, M. Àngels & Moya, Soledad & Orgaz, Neus, 2013. "The debate on rented assets capitalization: The economic impact on family firms," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 260-269.
    20. Darren Henderson & Patricia C. O’Brien, 2017. "The standard-setters’ toolkit: can principles prevail over bright lines?," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 644-676, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:abacus:v:61:y:2025:i:2:p:273-303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0001-3072 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.