IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjz/ajisjr/866.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Imperative of Logic in Composition and Writing

Author

Listed:
  • Samuel Asuquo Ekanem
  • Samuel Asuquo Ekanem

Abstract

Logic as an academic discipline focuses on the science of reasoning, inference and proof. However, these are different goals from it practical application in composition and writing. Most writers appear to ignore the importance or value of logic as a veritable tool towards effective writing and composition. Whenever logic is employed in composition or writing the emphasis seems to be towards the determination of the reasoning behind an argument as either being valid or invalid and using same to support or reject a thesis. Though the goals are different, a degree of familiarity with logic and the structure of well-formed arguments and reasoning are very necessary and vital in assisting writers to construct valid arguments/reasoning to support their theses and the evaluation and refutation of invalid arguments/reasoning employed in supporting others’ theses. Indeed, the lack of the understanding of logic and its principles has been a problem to effective writing and composition. Without a sound logic, there cannot be intellectually stimulating writing and composition. This has been the bane of scholarly writing and composition. It is on the basis of this therefore that we will examine the simple basics of logical argument, types of argument, some of the mistakes that are likely to be made when logic is used incorrectly. We will at the end establish the functionality and imperative of logic.

Suggested Citation

  • Samuel Asuquo Ekanem & Samuel Asuquo Ekanem, 2014. "The Imperative of Logic in Composition and Writing," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 3, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjz:ajisjr:866
    DOI: 10.5901/ajis.2014.v3n4p473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/3354
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/3354/3306
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5901/ajis.2014.v3n4p473?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjz:ajisjr:866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richtmann Publishing Ltd (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.