IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjz/ajisjr/545.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quality Assesment of Pepper Paste Using Different Milling Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Y.O. Bankole
  • O.A. Taninola
  • B.S. Adesina
  • D.O. Samuel

Abstract

This paper focused on milling methods for pepper. Four milling methods were considered; Attrition, Stone, Mortar & pestle, and Blender. Investigation on the quality; the microbial analysis, the physiochemical analysis, and the sensory evaluation were carried out on pepper milled using these milling methods mention above. The output temperature of the pepper for stone, mortar & pestle, blender and attrition were 38.470C, 38.470C, 48.370C and 48.470C respectively. The yield efficiency of the pepper for Attrition, mortar & pestle and Blender were 87.1%, 90.47%, 94.4% and 96.17% respectively. Total plate count, coliform count and fungal count for Attrition, Stone, mortar & pestle and Blender were 1.6 x 10-6, 2.3 x 102 & 8 x 10-5; 1.65 x 10-5, 1.29 x 102 & 2.08 x 10-3; 7.4 x 10-6, 4.9 x 10-3 & 1 x 10-3; and 2.28 x 10-9 , 1.33 x 102 & 2.16 x 10-3 respectively. Showing that Attrition had the highest level of microbiological contamination. Physiochemical analysis of the product for Attrition had reduction in protein, ester extract, (fat), ash and crude fibre. It also has high level of iron, zinc, and magnesium compared to the other methods of milling, these show that the nutrient contents of the product was adversely affected. Sensory evaluation shows that the colour and texture of the pepper milled with Attrition and stone were preferred above mortar & pestle and blender. In terms of quality, stone and Mortar & pestle have advantage over Attrition and blender, with the nutrients having little or no significant damage with less microbial contamination.

Suggested Citation

  • Y.O. Bankole & O.A. Taninola & B.S. Adesina & D.O. Samuel, 2013. "Quality Assesment of Pepper Paste Using Different Milling Methods," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 2, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjz:ajisjr:545
    DOI: 10.5901/ajis.2013.v2n10p187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/1712
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis/article/view/1712/1716
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5901/ajis.2013.v2n10p187?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjz:ajisjr:545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richtmann Publishing Ltd (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.richtmann.org/journal/index.php/ajis .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.