IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjx/jomwor/v2022y2022ip112-123id225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Model Analysis of Continuous Auditing in the Era of Big Data: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Lingjei Meng
  • Shuhui Shao

Abstract

In today's dynamic operating environment, continuous auditing (CA) can greatly improve the risk management, control and audit activities of business enterprises. However, relatively few enterprises have realised their full potentials because a clear, strong business case for establishing an effective CA system in their enterprises is lacking. The main objective of this study is to uncover the key decision-making factors of the CA strategy in the era of big data and to develop an evaluation model for the CA system when evaluation criteria conflict with one another. This study provides a model analysis of CA engagement and details the methodological issues in how to effectively construct a tailored-made CA mode for an enterprise. The MCGDM model consists of decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL), analytic network process (ANP), and zero-one goal programming (ZOGP) to simulate the practical problem of choosing the appropriate CA system to help decision-makers find the optimal solution, which incorporates both considerations of experts' opinions and resource constraints within an organisation. The findings of this paper would help business professionals in assessing the current status of their CA system and provide important managerial implications for continually reviewing business process to achieve their intended levels of performance and effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Lingjei Meng & Shuhui Shao, 2022. "A Model Analysis of Continuous Auditing in the Era of Big Data: A Case Study," Journal of Management World, Academia Publishing Group, vol. 2022, pages 112-123.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjx:jomwor:v:2022:y:2022:i::p:112-123:id:225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://managementworld.online/index.php/mw/article/view/225/223
    Download Restriction: Access to full texts is restricted to Journal of Management World
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjx:jomwor:v:2022:y:2022:i::p:112-123:id:225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LucĂ­a Aguado (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://managementworld.online/index.php/mw/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.