IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjx/jomwor/v2021y2021i3p91-103id163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study on the Initial Carbon Quota Allocation Scheme of Provincial Regions in China from the Perspective of Responsibility and Goal, Fairness and Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Wen Jun Wang
  • Zhi Long Chen

Abstract

China's commitment to identifying national carbon reduction targets is an essential topic. This study focuses on carbon quota allocation in China's unified carbon market under the principles of both equity and efficiency. First, we develop a carbon Gini coefficient to reflect the allocation equity and an emission abatement cost function to measure efficiency, respectively, which we further introduce as objectives into a multi-objective nonlinear programming model to obtain the optimal allocation. Second, we determine the optimal weights for the indicators constituting the comprehensive index, avoiding subjectivity in weight setting. Third, we calculate the provincial carbon intensity reduction burdens as well as the optimal carbon emission quos for 30 provinces in China, which has significant policy implications for the establishment of a unified national carbon market. Based on our results, we make four policy recommendations related to the construction of the national unified market. Our research not only contributes to the progress of existing literature on the methodology of regional allocation of carbon quotas, but also has a special interest for policy makers

Suggested Citation

  • Wen Jun Wang & Zhi Long Chen, 2021. "Study on the Initial Carbon Quota Allocation Scheme of Provincial Regions in China from the Perspective of Responsibility and Goal, Fairness and Efficiency," Journal of Management World, Academia Publishing Group, vol. 2021(3), pages 91-103.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjx:jomwor:v:2021:y:2021:i:3:p:91-103:id:163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://managementworld.online/index.php/mw/article/view/163/161
    Download Restriction: Access to full texts is restricted to Journal of Management World
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjx:jomwor:v:2021:y:2021:i:3:p:91-103:id:163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: LucĂ­a Aguado (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://managementworld.online/index.php/mw/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.