IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjw/techen/v10y2020i1p29-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison between Hydrochloric acid and Trifluoroacetic acid in hydrolysis method of exopolysaccharide from Ophiocordyceps sinensis in Monosaccharide composition analysis by GC-FID

Author

Listed:
  • Le Thi Thuy Hang

    (Institute of Tropical Biology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology; Graduate University of Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology; Faculty of Food Technology, Ho Chi Minh City University of Food Industry, Vietnam)

  • Ha Bao Chau

    (Faculty of Biology & Biotechnology, VNUHCM-University of Science, Vietnam)

  • Tran Van Hai Nam

    (Faculty of Biology & Biotechnology, VNUHCM-University of Science, Vietnam)

  • Pham Minh Thong

    (Faculty of Biology & Biotechnology, VNUHCM-University of Science, Vietnam)

  • Dang Hoang Phu

    (Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, VNUHCM-University of Science, Vietnam)

  • Dinh Minh Hiep

    (Ho Chi Minh City Agricultural Hi-Tech Park, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam)

  • Nguyen Tien Thang

    (Institute of Tropical Biology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology; Graduate University of Science and Technology, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Vietnam)

Abstract

The monosaccharide composition is one of the crucial factors affecting the bioactivity of exopolysaccharide (EPS) in Cordyceps species. Therefore, many scientists have studied, analyzed monosaccharide composition and structure of EPS from Cordyceps species, especially Ophiocordyceps sinensis (O. sinensis). This study aimed to compare hydrochloric acid (HCl) with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in the EPS hydrolysis process in monosaccharide composition analysis by Gas Chromatography with Flame-Ionization Detection (GC-FID). The hydrolysis is a crucial step in forming the acetyl derivative, which helps the GC-FID technique to have good results in monosaccharide composition analysis. The results showed that hydrolysis with HCl gave a higher hydrolysis efficiency and was more suitable than hydrolysis by TFA in pretreatment to EPS for GC-FID. Hydrolysis results were analyzed through thin-layer chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), then Acetyl derivatives were produced and finally analyzed by GC-FID to determine the monosaccharide composition of EPS. For EPS hydrolyzed by HCl, the analytical results presented that this sample had 6 kinds of monosaccharides, including rhamnose, arabinose, xylose, mannose, glucose, and galactose; the most monosaccharide was glucose. The EPS hydrolyzed by TFA only detected three kinds of monosaccharides, including mannose, arabinose, and galactose, mainly mannose. The study has set a foundation for further analysis of monosaccharide composition and structure of EPS from O. sinensis.

Suggested Citation

  • Le Thi Thuy Hang & Ha Bao Chau & Tran Van Hai Nam & Pham Minh Thong & Dang Hoang Phu & Dinh Minh Hiep & Nguyen Tien Thang, 2020. "A comparison between Hydrochloric acid and Trifluoroacetic acid in hydrolysis method of exopolysaccharide from Ophiocordyceps sinensis in Monosaccharide composition analysis by GC-FID," HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE - ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, HO CHI MINH CITY OPEN UNIVERSITY, vol. 10(1), pages 29-36.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjw:techen:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:29-36
    DOI: 10.46223/HCMCOUJS.tech.en.10.1.357.2020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journalofscience.ou.edu.vn/index.php/tech-en/article/view/357/286
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.tech.en.10.1.357.2020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjw:techen:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:29-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vu Tuan Truong (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journalofscience.ou.edu.vn/index.php/tech-en .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.