IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjf/journl/v8y2023i11p157-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Factorial Validity of the Community of Inquiry Instrument (COI) in Filipino Students: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Ma Erenita V. Bahian, maerenita.

    (Eastern Visayas State University-Ormoc Campus, Ormoc City, Philippines Faculty of Education, Computer Studies and Engineering)

  • Danilo B. Pulma.

    (Eastern Visayas State University-Ormoc Campus, Ormoc City, Philippines Faculty of Education, Computer Studies and Engineering)

  • Edward B. Bertulfo

    (Eastern Visayas State University-Ormoc Campus, Ormoc City, Philippines Faculty of Education, Computer Studies and Engineering)

  • Joel Maraviles

    (Eastern Visayas State University-Ormoc Campus, Ormoc City, Philippines Faculty of Education, Computer Studies and Engineering)

Abstract

Numerous researchers have written extensively about the value of communities of inquiry. In order to structure and support the process of online teaching and learning, the framework highlighted aspects that are crucial for comprehending the characteristics of an online learning experience. The models and results produced by such investigations, notwithstanding efforts to examine the community of inquiry, were inconclusive. The present study evaluates the factorial validity of the Community of Inquiry Instrument. A structural equation modelling was conducted from July to September 2022 on a sample of 373 Filipino university students in Ormoc City, Philippines. A 34-item COI with three subscales: teaching presence, social presence and cognitive presence was the instrument used in the study, which were rated on a 5-point Likert scale from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were performed using SPSS and AMOS, respectively. Results showed that Cronbach’s alpha values for each construct ranged from 0.822 to 0.917, of which the items were internally consistent. Results also illustrates that the hypothesized three-factor model that explains the 34 COI item responses was not a good fit. This may be an example of a complex model misspecification where the connection between the items and factors has been misrepresented and numerous exploratory factor analysis of the data failed to yield an interpretable solution. However, a 27-item, three-factor model turned to have a good fit ([X2 =654.764; df = 315; X2/df = 2.079; TLI=.913; CFI=.922; RMSEA=.054; SRMR=.021]. In conclusion, the 27 item COI is a valid and reliable measure for determining the students’ teaching, social and cognitive presences in virtual education.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma Erenita V. Bahian, maerenita. & Danilo B. Pulma. & Edward B. Bertulfo & Joel Maraviles, 2023. "Assessing the Factorial Validity of the Community of Inquiry Instrument (COI) in Filipino Students: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS), vol. 8(11), pages 157-168, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjf:journl:v:8:y:2023:i:11:p:157-168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/digital-library/volume-8-issue-11/157-168.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/articles/assessing-the-factorial-validity-of-the-community-of-inquiry-instrument-coi-in-filipino-students-a-confirmatory-factor-analysis/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjf:journl:v:8:y:2023:i:11:p:157-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.