IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjf/journl/v11y2026i3p107-113.html

Beyond Fast Fashion: A Comparative Review of Upcycling and Recycling Strategies in Sustainable Fashion Design

Author

Listed:
  • Ananna Mostafiz

    (Faculty Member, Department of Fashion Design & Technology Shanto-Mariam University of Creative Technology, Dhaka)

Abstract

The environmental impact of the global fashion industry has intensified concerns regarding unsustainable production practices and the rapid accumulation of textile waste. As the fast fashion model continues to dominate global clothing markets, researchers and industry stakeholders are increasingly exploring circular strategies capable of reducing environmental harm while maintaining economic viability. Among the most widely discussed approaches are recycling and upcycling, both of which aim to extend the lifecycle of textile materials and reduce dependence on virgin resources. However, existing academic literature often discusses these strategies separately, with relatively few studies offering a systematic comparison between them within the context of sustainable fashion design. This study presents a structured literature review that critically examines recycling and upcycling as complementary strategies within circular fashion systems. Academic articles, books, institutional reports, and conference publications published between 2010 and 2024 were identified through systematic searches of databases including Scopus, Google Scholar, and JSTOR. After applying inclusion criteria related to relevance, academic credibility, and thematic focus, 65 sources were selected and analyzed using thematic content analysis. The findings indicate that recycling is primarily associated with industrial-scale material recovery and technological processing that allows large volumes of textile waste to be converted into new fibers. While this approach can reduce reliance on virgin materials, it may involve technological limitations such as fiber degradation and energy-intensive processing. Upcycling, in contrast, is strongly linked to design innovation and creative reuse, enabling designers to transform existing garments or textile waste into new products without destroying the original material structure. Upcycling can promote emotional durability, cultural value, and consumer engagement in sustainable fashion, although it often faces challenges related to scalability and integration within industrial supply chains. The study argues that recycling and upcycling should not be viewed as competing strategies but rather as complementary components of a broader circular fashion ecosystem. Hybrid models that combine recycling infrastructure with design-led upcycling practices may offer more holistic solutions to the environmental challenges facing the fashion industry. By synthesizing existing research and presenting a comparative framework, this paper contributes to sustainable fashion scholarship and provides insights for designers, policymakers, educators, and industry stakeholders seeking to transition toward regenerative fashion systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Ananna Mostafiz, 2026. "Beyond Fast Fashion: A Comparative Review of Upcycling and Recycling Strategies in Sustainable Fashion Design," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS), vol. 11(3), pages 107-113, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjf:journl:v:11:y:2026:i:3:p:107-113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/uploads/vol11-iss3-pg107-113-202603_pdf.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/view/beyond-fast-fashion-a-comparative-review-of-upcycling-and-recycling-strategies-in-sustainable-fashion-design/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjf:journl:v:11:y:2026:i:3:p:107-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.