IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjf/journl/v11y2026i13p1-7.html

Performance Assessment of Sustainable Self-Compacting Concrete Incorporating GBFS, CPA, and CSA as Cement Replacement Materials

Author

Listed:
  • Adeniji A.A.

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Ibadan, Ibadan)

  • Ayegbusi O.A.

    (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Ibadan, Ibadan)

Abstract

Self-Compacting Concrete (SCC) has become an important advancement in concrete technology due to its ability to flow under its own weight, fill formwork completely, and pass through congested reinforcement without external vibration. These characteristics improve construction efficiency, reduce labor and noise, and enhance surface finish and structural reliability (Okamura & Ouchi, 2003; EFNARC, 2005). As a result, SCC is increasingly used in complex structural applications. However, the production of SCC often requires high cement content and carefully controlled aggregate grading, which can increase cost and environmental impact. In recent years, growing concerns over climate change and resource depletion have driven research toward more sustainable concrete materials. One widely adopted approach is the use of supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) to partially replace ordinary Portland cement. Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GBFS), a by-product of the steel industry, has been extensively studied due to its ability to reduce carbon emissions while improving long-term mechanical performance and durability of concrete (Shi et al., 2015; Thomas, 2018). Studies conducted between 2020 and 2025 have confirmed that GBFS can enhance later-age compressive strength in SCC by refining pore structure and contributing to continued hydration, although early-age strength may be slightly reduced depending on replacement level (Singh et al., 2021; Li & Huang, 2023). In addition to cement replacement, the selection and proportioning of aggregates play a critical role in determining SCC performance. Aggregate characteristics such as shape, surface texture, and grading strongly influence fresh properties, particularly flowability, passing ability, and segregation resistance (Neville, 2011). Recent research has shown that the use of alternative or processed aggregates, including Crushed Stone Aggregate (CSA) and Coarse Processed Aggregate (CPA), can significantly affect SCC rheology and strength development. Angular and rough-textured aggregates tend to increase internal friction, thereby reducing workability unless compensated by mix design adjustments or chemical admixtures (Mohammadhosseini et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2022). Workability has consistently been identified as one of the most sensitive properties of SCC incorporating sustainable materials. Several studies conducted in the last five years report that increasing the proportion of SCMs or alternative aggregates can reduce slump flow and stability if not properly optimized (Abbas et al., 2023; Safiuddin et al., 2021). Conversely, appropriate use of GBFS has been shown to improve the viscosity and cohesiveness of SCC, contributing to stable flow behavior when combined with suitable aggregate grading (Zhang et al., 2022).

Suggested Citation

  • Adeniji A.A. & Ayegbusi O.A., 2026. "Performance Assessment of Sustainable Self-Compacting Concrete Incorporating GBFS, CPA, and CSA as Cement Replacement Materials," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS), vol. 11(13), pages 1-7, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjf:journl:v:11:y:2026:i:13:p:1-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/uploads/vol11-iss13-pg1-7-202601_pdf.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/view/performance-assessment-of-sustainable-self-compacting-concrete-incorporating-gbfs-cpa-and-csa-as-cement-replacement-materials/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjf:journl:v:11:y:2026:i:13:p:1-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.