IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjf/journl/v10y2025i8p2173-2185.html

Social Media and African Crises: A Comparative Study of Nigeria and South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Osuji Kingsley Chibueze

    (Graduate Research Scholar, Institute of International Relations and World History, The National Research State University of Nizhny Novgorod named after N.I. Lobachevsky, Russia Master Student, Department of Cyberpsychology, Faculty of social sciences The National Research State University of Nizhny Novgorod named after N.I. Lobachevsky, Russia)

  • Ukoh Rita Erdoo

    (Graduate Research Scholar, Institute of International Relations and World History, The National Research State University of Nizhny Novgorod named after N.I. Lobachevsky, Russia Master Student, Department of Cyberpsychology, Faculty of social sciences The National Research State University of Nizhny Novgorod named after N.I. Lobachevsky, Russia)

  • Eze Ifunanya Godswill

    (Graduate Research Scholar, Institute of International Relations and World History, The National Research State University of Nizhny Novgorod named after N.I. Lobachevsky, Russia Master Student, Department of Cyberpsychology, Faculty of social sciences The National Research State University of Nizhny Novgorod named after N.I. Lobachevsky, Russia)

Abstract

This study analyses the intricate influence of social media on crisis dynamics in Africa by contrasting Nigeria’s #EndSARS protests (2020) with South Africa’s instability in July 2021. This research utilises a comparative case study and mixed-methods approach, incorporating quantitative hashtag analysis, digital penetration statistics, and qualitative content coding, to investigate how technological infrastructures, historical legacies, and socio-political contexts influence social media’s dual role in empowering marginalised voices and intensifying social fragmentation. This article theoretically integrates the networked public sphere within African hybrid media ecologies, utilising framing theory to emphasise colonial, ethnic, and economic narratives, and examines the activism-surveillance dilemma that underscores the dual emancipatory and repressive potentials of digital platforms. The findings illustrate Nigeria’s largely youth-driven, Twitter-centric movement as a paradigm of decentralised activism and global cooperation, in stark contrast to South Africa’s WhatsApp-enabled turmoil characterised by disinformation and xenophobic violence within insular networks. The results highlight that platform impacts are profoundly influenced by contextual factors, including infrastructure, governmental capability, and colonial history. The research promotes legislative measures that emphasise digital literacy, multilingual supervision, safeguarding digital rights, and governance of platforms headed by Africans. This research provides a context-sensitive, decolonial framework to elucidate social media’s paradoxical effects on democratic processes and crisis management in Africa.

Suggested Citation

  • Osuji Kingsley Chibueze & Ukoh Rita Erdoo & Eze Ifunanya Godswill, 2025. "Social Media and African Crises: A Comparative Study of Nigeria and South Africa," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS), vol. 10(8), pages 2173-2185, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjf:journl:v:10:y:2025:i:8:p:2173-2185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/digital-library/volume-10-issue-8/2173-2185.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/articles/social-media-and-african-crises-a-comparative-study-of-nigeria-and-south-africa/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjf:journl:v:10:y:2025:i:8:p:2173-2185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.