IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjf/journl/v10y2025i7p183-211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Students’ Perception of Traditional and Online Laboratories toward Academic Achievement in Biology

Author

Listed:
  • Jhen Rose A. Samosino

    (Don Carlos Polytechnic College)

  • Ellen Joy F. Bugawan

    (Don Carlos Polytechnic College)

  • Reyan Jen B. Amper

    (Don Carlos Polytechnic College)

  • Irene C. Armenton

    (Don Carlos Polytechnic College)

  • Jezza S. Alicante

    (Don Carlos Polytechnic College)

  • Reyzamae D. Sagandilan

    (Don Carlos Polytechnic College)

Abstract

The study examined how third-year Biology students at Don Carlos Polytechnic College perceive traditional and online laboratories, and whether these perceptions are related to their academic achievement. Sixty students participated, and researchers employed statistical methods, including mean analysis and correlation coefficients, to gather insights. The findings revealed that students strongly preferred traditional laboratories, rating them highly for their positive impact on learning, engagement, and satisfaction. Students felt that these labs not only enhanced their performance and critical thinking but also provided interactive and enjoyable experiences that boosted their confidence. While online laboratories were also viewed positively—particularly for encouraging independent learning and offering flexibility—students expressed a stronger emotional connection to traditional lab environments. Academically, most students performed well, with the majority receiving grades in the “Very Good†range, and a few achieving “Excellent†or “Good.†Overall, the class demonstrated strong academic performance with room for improvement. Finally, correlation analysis revealed no statistically significant relationship between students’ perceptions of either traditional or online laboratories and their academic achievement. The correlation coefficients and p-values for online (r=−0.126, p=0.334) and traditional labs (r=0.004, p=0.974) indicated weak and insignificant relationships. Based on the results, the study showed no significant relationship and failed to accept the alternative hypothesis.

Suggested Citation

  • Jhen Rose A. Samosino & Ellen Joy F. Bugawan & Reyan Jen B. Amper & Irene C. Armenton & Jezza S. Alicante & Reyzamae D. Sagandilan, 2025. "Students’ Perception of Traditional and Online Laboratories toward Academic Achievement in Biology," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS), vol. 10(7), pages 183-211, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjf:journl:v:10:y:2025:i:7:p:183-211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/digital-library/volume-10-issue-7/183-211.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/articles/students-perception-of-traditional-and-online-laboratories-toward-academic-achievement-in-biology/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjf:journl:v:10:y:2025:i:7:p:183-211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.