Author
Listed:
- Elijah Kusi
(Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development, P. O. Box 1277, Kumasi-Ghana)
- Emmanuel Appiah-Kubi
(Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development, P. O. Box 1277, Kumasi-Ghana)
- Elijah Kusi
(Department of Construction Technology and Management Education, Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development, P. O. Box 1277, Kumasi-Ghana)
- Fredrick Simpeh
(Department of Construction Technology and Management Education, Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development, P. O. Box 1277, Kumasi-Ghana)
- Chelteau Barajei
(Department of Construction Technology and Management Education, Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development, P. O. Box 1277, Kumasi-Ghana)
- Francis Gyimah
(Department of Construction Technology and Management Education, Akenten Appiah-Menka University of Skills Training and Entrepreneurial Development, P. O. Box 1277, Kumasi-Ghana)
Abstract
In today’s world, it is necessary to conserve energy while maintaining a comfortable and healthy indoor climate in buildings. In tropical climates, individuals are exposed to longer durations of discomfort and a higher chance of developing health problems in buildings. The indoor thermal settings of a building have a significant impact on inhabitants’ health, productivity, and learning abilities. The study sought to validate the measured results of the existing naturally ventilated university classroom through parametric modeling and Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation. The study compared the simulated results to the measured or experimental results to validate the accuracy of the building model created in Autodesk Revit. In Ghana’s Ashanti Region (Kumasi), experimental measurements were carried out between November and April 2023, during the dry season, and between May and October 2023, during the wet season. Data loggers (Testo data loggers) were used to capture data continuously for 24 hours. The indoor measured data and the indoor simulated results were compared. A comparison of the building model data and the existing building conditions was made to reduce errors. Classrooms ASBGF, FF, and SF recorded a difference of 0.15oC, -1.52oC, and -1.77oC between measured and simulated values with a percentage difference of 0.48%, 5.12%, and 5.82% for the dry season and -1.43oC, -0.09oC, and 2.46oC with a percentage difference of 5.60%, 0.30%, and 8.50% for the wet season. Negative values indicate that the measured data was higher than the simulated data. The dry season values were higher than the wet season values, and this was realized across all the measured and simulated parameters except the air velocity, which recorded higher dry season values for the simulation as compared to the measured values. The study concluded that the indoor space of the studied building was slightly warm, with a 43.66% discomfort level during the dry season, and cool with a 24.89% discomfort level during the wet season. The study recommended that architects should assess the thermal comfort conditions of existing university classrooms to ascertain the building’s comfort level for retrofitting. The study recommended that architects should use parametric building models for a whole building simulation to validate the measured thermal comfort of existing buildings for retrofitting.
Suggested Citation
Elijah Kusi & Emmanuel Appiah-Kubi & Elijah Kusi & Fredrick Simpeh & Chelteau Barajei & Francis Gyimah, 2025.
"Thermal Comfort in Existing Naturally Ventilated University Classroom: Validation of Measured Values by Simulated Values through BIM,"
International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Applied Science (IJRIAS), vol. 10(4), pages 983-999, April.
Handle:
RePEc:bjf:journl:v:10:y:2025:i:4:p:983-999
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjf:journl:v:10:y:2025:i:4:p:983-999. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.