IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjf/ijltem/v15y2026i8a216.html

An Empirical Analysis of Overconfidence and Anchoring Biases in Investment Decision-Making

Author

Listed:
  • Dr. Shamshuddin M Nadaf

    (Assistant Professor, Department of Post Graduate Studies and Research in Commerce, Rani Channamma University, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.)

  • Dr. Yasmin Begum Nadaf

    (Associate Professor, Department of Commerce, Govt. First Grade College for Women, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.)

Abstract

Behavioural finance has emerged as an important field of study by recognizing that investment decisions are not always based on rational analysis but are frequently influenced by psychological biases. Among these biases, overconfidence and anchoring significantly affect investors' judgment, risk perception, and portfolio decisions. The present study empirically examines the influence of overconfidence and anchoring biases on investment decision-making among retail investors in Belagavi city. The study adopts a descriptive and exploratory research design and utilizes both primary and secondary data. Primary data were collected through a structured questionnaire administered to retail investors using a random sampling technique. Out of 70 responses collected, 56 valid questionnaires were used for analysis after excluding incomplete responses. Descriptive statistical tools, including frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation, were employed to analyse the data. The demographic profile indicates that the majority of respondents were male, young, well-educated, and belonged to low- and middle-income groups. The findings reveal that respondents exhibit a moderate level of overconfidence bias, with mean scores ranging from 3.13 to 3.80. Investors expressed strong confidence in the correctness of their investment decisions and showed a considerable tendency to rely on their own judgment while investing. The analysis also indicates a moderately high level of anchoring bias, with mean scores ranging from 3.39 to 3.89. Most respondents compared current market prices with purchase prices before selling investments and relied heavily on historical price trends and previous market information while making investment decisions. A comparative analysis suggests that anchoring bias is relatively more pronounced than overconfidence bias among the respondents. The study concludes that psychological biases substantially influence retail investors' decision-making and may lead to irrational investment behaviour, excessive trading, delayed selling decisions, and suboptimal portfolio performance. The findings highlight the need for behavioural finance education, investor awareness programmes, and objective investment strategies to minimize the adverse effects of cognitive biases and promote rational investment decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Dr. Shamshuddin M Nadaf & Dr. Yasmin Begum Nadaf, 2026. "An Empirical Analysis of Overconfidence and Anchoring Biases in Investment Decision-Making," International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science, RSIS International, vol. 15(8), pages 314-323, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjf:ijltem:v:15:y:2026:i:8:a:216
    DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150800022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ijltemas.in/uploads/vol15-iss8-pg314-323-202609_pdf.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.ijltemas.in/article/an-empirical-analysis-of-overconfidence-and-anchoring-biases-in-investment-decision-making
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150800022?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjf:ijltem:v:15:y:2026:i:8:a:216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ijltemas.in/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.