Author
Listed:
- Finu Jasmin E.N.
(Research Scholar, PSMO College (Autonomous), Tirurangadi)
- Dr. Shabeer VP
(Assistant Professor, PSMO College (Autonomous), Tirurangadi)
Abstract
Dark patterns are strategies deliberately designed on digital platforms to exploit consumer cognitive limitations and information asymmetry, and are now documented across the majority of major digital platforms globally. However, how consumers morally evaluate these practices and how these evaluations shape trust and behaviour is theoretically underdeveloped. This paper aims to bridge the disciplinary gap between the dark patterns literature, which has concentrated on design classification and prevalence auditing, and the marketing ethics literature, which has not operationalized its well established consumer ethical perception framework to dark patterns. This paper draws from the legacy of unethical marketing, ethics position theory, the persuasion knowledge model and consumer trust theory to propose the Dark Pattern Consumer Ethics Framework (DPCEF) - an integrated theoretical model linking dark pattern perception to consumer trust erosion and behavioural outcomes. The framework proposes Perceived Dark Pattern Unethicality (PDPU) as the formally defined consumer side moral evaluation construct specific to dark patterns, theorises a two stage recognition-evaluation process in which digital literacy moderates the idealism PDPU relationship, and advances consumer platform trust as the mediating mechanism for behavioural outcomes such as negative behavioural intentions and regulatory support response. Finally, seven testable propositions based on theory are proposed. The framework makes a theoretical contribution to consumer ethics by formally integrating two literatures that have evolved in disciplinary isolation, expands the Persuasion Knowledge Model to contexts of digital dark patterns, and introduces regulatory support intention as a new behavioural outcome of perceived marketing unethicality with direct implications for digital consumer protection policy in emerging markets.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjf:ijltem:v:15:y:2026:i:7:a:91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ijltemas.in/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.