Author
Listed:
- Nilesh B. Gawali
(Research Scholar, Anantrao Pawar College of Engineering & Research, Pune, Affiliated To Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, India)
- Dr. Sunil B. Thakare
(Professor & Principal, Anantrao Pawar College of Engineering & Research, Pune, Affiliated To Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, India)
- Dr. Dattatray P. Kamble
(Phd Coordinator, Anantrao Pawar College of Engineering & Research, Pune, Affiliated To Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, Maharashtra, India)
Abstract
This study presents the design and finite-element analysis (FEM) of three reinforced cement concrete (RCC) column configurations under seismic effect, with the objective of quantifying how a central Sal-timber core alters the structural performance of an otherwise conventional RCC column. All three columns are of identical external size (300 × 300 mm) and clear height 3.0 m, fixed at both ends, and use M30 concrete, Fe500 steel, 4–16 mm φ longitudinal bars (steel ratio 0.89 %) and 8 mm φ ties at 150 mm c/c. The configurations are a plain RCC column (C1), and two timber-composite RCC columns with 100 × 100 mm (C2) and 150 × 150 mm (C3) Sal-timber cores. Each column is idealised as a fixed-fixed line member discretised into six Euler-Bernoulli beam elements, using transformed-section properties (modular ratios m = 7.30 for steel and n = 0.456 for timber). Axial capacity is computed per IS 456:2000, modal and elastic-buckling behaviour from the FEM stiffness, and seismic demand by the equivalent-static method of IS 1893 (Part 1):2016 for Zone V. The results show that, because the timber core sits near the neutral axis, flexural rigidity falls only 0.6 % (C2) and 3.1 % (C3) and lateral drift is practically unchanged, while self-weight drops 7 % and 16 % respectively, reducing seismic base shear and end moments by a similar margin. The principal penalty is a reduction in ultimate axial capacity of 6 % (C2) and 13 % (C3). All three columns remain short (buckling never governs), satisfy the 0.4 % drift limit, and plot safely within the P–M interaction envelope. The 100 × 100 mm timber core offers the best balance of weight and seismic-demand reduction with negligible loss of capacity.
Suggested Citation
Nilesh B. Gawali & Dr. Sunil B. Thakare & Dr. Dattatray P. Kamble, 2026.
"Design and Finite Element Analysis of RCC and Timber-Composite RCC Columns with Seismic Effect,"
International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science, RSIS International, vol. 15(6), pages 3883-3893, July.
Handle:
RePEc:bjf:ijltem:v:15:y:2026:i:6:a:3109
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150600288
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjf:ijltem:v:15:y:2026:i:6:a:3109. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ijltemas.in/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.