Author
Listed:
- Charles Roland Haruna
(Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana)
- Maame Gyamfua Asante-Mensah
(Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana)
- Kwadwo Sarbeng-Baafi
(Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana)
- Sandro Kwame Amofa
(Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana)
Abstract
Drowsy driving is among the major factors leading to accidents on roads, especially in scenarios where long hours of traveling or working are involved. The current paper performs a comparative analysis between traditional machine learning (ML) techniques and lightweight deep learning (DL) methods concerning driver drowsiness detection using the YawDD Dataset (a yawning detection dataset). This Dataset consists of 322 videos from the mirror (rear-view mirror camera position) subset and 29 videos from its Dash (dashboard) subset, recorded from 107 drivers of diverse ages, gender and ethnicities. The videos are presented in various levels of illumination and facial occlusions (glasses and sunglasses) as well as poses. Frames were extracted from the videos at regular intervals resulting in thousands of labelled images. This study evaluates two types of algorithms based on their performance through several parameters such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score while simultaneously considering the efficiency of computation measured by inference time, CPU usage, memory, and frames per second (FPS). According to the findings, while DL models like the convolutional neural network based on EfficientNet and TinyCNN offer better classification performance with accuracy levels surpassing 93%, these models exhibit inferior inference rates. Consequently, these DL models cannot be employed in real-time situations since they require hardware accelerators. On the other hand, traditional ML models, mainly the combination of Random Forest and Support Vector Machine, offer a good balance between accuracy and efficiency. Logistic regression provides the best processing rate but with limited accuracy. Conclusively, the results imply that traditional ML models are still applicable for real-time tasks in resource-constrained environments compared to DL models. However, DL models are recommended for implementations where hardware accelerators are available.
Suggested Citation
Charles Roland Haruna & Maame Gyamfua Asante-Mensah & Kwadwo Sarbeng-Baafi & Sandro Kwame Amofa, 2026.
"Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Real-Time Driver Drowsiness Detection,"
International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science, RSIS International, vol. 15(6), pages 3252-3271, July.
Handle:
RePEc:bjf:ijltem:v:15:y:2026:i:6:a:3060
DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2026.150600239
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjf:ijltem:v:15:y:2026:i:6:a:3060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ijltemas.in/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.