Author
Listed:
- Peter Simon Kwofie
(Counselling and Student Support Unit, University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa, Ghana)
- Robert Ewusi-Ntenah
(Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Studies, University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa, Ghana)
- Abigail Adwoa Anooh Hagan
(Faculty of Engineering, University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa, Ghana)
Abstract
School conflict management is often judged by whether it restores visible order. In boarding Senior High Schools, however, students and staff continue to live and work together after disputes have been formally resolved; therefore, effectiveness also depends on whether disciplinary processes are perceived as fair, respectful and legitimate. This article examines how heads, senior house staff, guidance and counselling coordinators and student leaders perceived the effectiveness of conflict-management strategies in two public boarding Senior High Schools in the Tarkwa-Nsuaem Municipality of Ghana. Drawing on a qualitative multiple-case study involving 24 participants, the article argues that effectiveness was interpreted through two related but distinct lenses: compliance-based effectiveness and legitimacy-based effectiveness. School A associated effectiveness mainly with discipline, deterrence, improved attendance and behavioural compliance, while School B associated it more strongly with engagement, relational repair, calm and follow-up. Across both cases, strategies were judged more positively when they involved timely response, meaningful voice, consistency, reason-giving, counselling support and fair stakeholder involvement. Negative cases showed that perceived bias, failure to hear parties, external reversal of decisions and weak consultation could undermine confidence even where formal disciplinary structures existed. The article contributes to school leadership literature by showing that conflict-management effectiveness in boarding Senior High Schools should be assessed not only by reduced misconduct but also by the fairness of the process through which order is achieved.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjf:ijltem:v:15:y:2026:i:5:a:2597. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ijltemas.in/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.