Author
Abstract
Background: India's healthcare AI landscape is rapidly evolving, yet a critical infrastructure gap persists: the absence of a sovereign, interoperable benchmarking platform for systematic validation of AI models against clinically representative datasets. This paper introduces BODH (Benchmarking Open Data Platform for Health AI), a pioneering digital ecosystem unveiled at the India AI Impact Summit 2026, designed to address this deficit. Objective: To present the technical architecture, evaluation methodology, governance framework, and anticipated clinical impact of BODH as India's first federated AI benchmarking infrastructure for healthcare, conforming to international standards including HL7 FHIR R4, SNOMED CT, and OMOP CDM. Methods: BODH employs a multi-layer microservices architecture incorporating federated data ingestion, a secure model evaluation sandbox, and a cryptographically audited leaderboard. Evaluation dimensions span diagnostic accuracy, fairness across demographic strata, model explainability (SHAP, LIME, integrated gradients), clinical safety, and regulatory alignment. Benchmark datasets cover radiology (chest X-ray, CT, MRI), pathology, genomics, clinical NLP (EHR), and wearable biosignals. Results: Preliminary validation with 12 pilot AI models across 5 Indian hospital networks demonstrates that BODH's multi-dimensional scoring reduces overestimation of model accuracy by 18-34% compared to single-metric evaluation. Fairness gap indices reveal statistically significant performance disparities (p < 0.01) across gender and socioeconomic strata in 7 of 12 models, previously unreported in vendor evaluations. Conclusions: BODH represents a transformational step in responsible AI adoption in Indian healthcare. By institutionalising open, reproducible, and regulation-aligned benchmarking, it creates a verifiable trust layer that bridges the gap between AI development and clinical deployment, serving as a model for low- and middle- income country (LMIC) AI governance frameworks.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjf:ijltem:v:15:y:2026:i:2:a:2128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ijltemas.in/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.