IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjf/ijltem/v14y2025i12a771.html

Morphometric Analysis of Calcaneal Angles (Bohler’s and Gissane’s angle) in the North Indian Population

Author

Listed:
  • Khursheed Ahmad Ganie

    (Allied Health Sciences Department, Chitkara School of Health Sciences, Chitkara, University, Rajpura Punjab)

  • Tazim Hussian Padder

    (Department of Radio-imaging Technology & Diagnosis SGT University, Gurugram, Haryana)

  • Ananya Sharma

    (Allied Health Sciences Department, Gulzar Group of Institutions, Khanna, Punjab)

Abstract

Background: Calcaneal fractures are the most common tarsal bone injuries, accounting for 60–70% of tarsal fractures, and frequently occur due to high-energy trauma such as road traffic accidents and falls from height. These fractures significantly impair mobility and work capacity, particularly among individuals aged 21–45 years. Radiographic assessment using Bohler’s and Gissane’s angles is essential for determining fracture severity and guiding appropriate treatment planning. Methodology: A study was conducted in the SGT University Hospital Gurugram, Haryana. The study included 100 cases (60M, 40F), with mean age 41.66 ± 17.14 years (Range 15 - 89 years). Ankle lateral radiograph was taken by using CR X-ray machine (Fuji Modality). Lateral ankle radiographs in all the cases were evaluated for the measurement of Bohler’s and Gissane’s angle with the help of experienced Radiologist and Orthopedician. Result: The mean of Bohler’s angle and Gissane’s angle in the north Indian population were 28.70° (15 - 54°) and 112.18° (100 - 13°) respectively. The mean Bohler’s angle was found highest (30.57 ± 5.88°) in age group with age ranged from 15 - 29 years and lowest (27.44 ± 7.36°) in age group with age ranged from 30 - 44 years whereas Gissane’s angle was found highest (116.56 ± 10.03°) and lowest (109.77 ± 5.54°) in age group with age range of 75 - 89 years and 30 - 44 years respectively. There was no significant Difference in the Bohler’s and Gissane’s angle between males and females. Conclusion: In the north Indian population, the mean of Gissane’s angle and mean Bohler’s angle was found 28.70 ± 7.24° and 112.18 ± 7.09° respectively. There was no significant Difference in the Bohler’s and Gissane’s angle between genders.

Suggested Citation

  • Khursheed Ahmad Ganie & Tazim Hussian Padder & Ananya Sharma, 2025. "Morphometric Analysis of Calcaneal Angles (Bohler’s and Gissane’s angle) in the North Indian Population," International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science, RSIS International, vol. 14(12), pages 53-60, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjf:ijltem:v:14:y:2025:i:12:a:771
    DOI: 10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1412000007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ijltemas.in/submission/online/article/view/3699/4742
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.ijltemas.in/submission/online/article/view/3699
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.51583/IJLTEMAS.2025.1412000007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjf:ijltem:v:14:y:2025:i:12:a:771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ijltemas.in/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.