IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjc/journl/v13y2026i2p477-491.html

COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake, Knowledge and Perceptions Among People Living with HIV in Livingstone District, Zambia: A Mixed-Methods Study

Author

Listed:
  • Trywell Nankulo

    (Department of Social Sciences, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Rusangu University)

Abstract

Background: People living with HIV (PLWH) are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes, yet limited evidence exists on their vaccine-related knowledge, attitudes, and uptake in Zambia. This study assessed COVID-19 vaccination prevalence and examined the factors shaping vaccine behaviors among PLWH attending ART services in Livingstone District, Zambia. Methods: We employed a cross-sectional mixed-methods design at Mahatma Gandhi Clinic from April to June 2022. Systematic random sampling (every third patient) was used to select 384 PLWH aged ≥18 years from a clinic population of 2,197. Quantitative data on vaccine uptake, knowledge, and perceptions were collected via structured interviews. Purposive sampling selected 20 participants for in-depth qualitative interviews exploring attitudes and explanatory narratives. Descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of vaccination; qualitative data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis framework. Results: Vaccination prevalence was 78.9% (303/384; 95% CI: 74.5%-82.8%). Knowledge and positive perceptions were widespread: 97.1% knew COVID-19 had no cure, 98.2% recognized vaccines as preventive, and 99.5% were aware of vaccine availability. Most perceived vaccines as safe (97.1%), effective (96.4%), beneficial to all (97.9%), and trusted manufacturers (96.6%). Multivariable logistic regression identified significant negative predictors of uptake: perceiving vaccines as not beneficial to all (AOR = 5.41, 95% CI: 1.20-24.32, p=0.028), distrust of manufacturers (AOR = 3.48, 95% CI: 1.43-8.48, p=0.006), belief that vaccination controls human activities (AOR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.10-4.85, p=0.027), and belief that suppliers act in bad faith (AOR = 2.39, 95% CI: 1.13-5.05, p=0.022). Qualitative analysis revealed three themes: 1) Trust in biomedical authority ("it has been approved medically"); 2) Genocidal conspiracy beliefs ("they have intentions of wiping out the entire Africa"); and 3) Vaccination as social control ("to stop us from going to church"). Conclusions: While COVID-19 vaccine uptake among PLWH in Livingstone is high and grounded in trust in medical approval, a significant minority remain hesitant due to deep-seated conspiracy beliefs framing vaccination as a tool for population control and harm. This dual reality must inform targeted interventions leveraging trusted healthcare relationships within ART programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Trywell Nankulo, 2026. "COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake, Knowledge and Perceptions Among People Living with HIV in Livingstone District, Zambia: A Mixed-Methods Study," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 13(2), pages 477-491, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:13:y:2026:i:2:p:477-491
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/uploads/vol13-iss2-pg477-491-202602_pdf.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/view/covid-19-vaccine-uptake-knowledge-and-perceptions-among-people-living-with-hiv-in-livingstone-district-zambia-a-mixed-methods-study/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:13:y:2026:i:2:p:477-491. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.