IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjc/journl/v12y2025i9p3614-3629.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rehabilitation of Patients With Low Back Pain in Hospitals in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Faith Chinnonye Okere

    (University Of Rijeka, Faculty Of Health Studies, Undergraduate Professional/University Study Programme Physiotherapy)

  • Verner MarijanÄ ić

    (University Of Rijeka, Faculty Of Health Studies, Undergraduate Professional/University Study Programme Physiotherapy)

Abstract

This Study Investigates The Current Methods Of Diagnosing And Rehabilitating Low Back Pain (LBP), Prevalence Of LBP In Ibadan, A City In The Southwestern Part Of Nigeria, And Compares Them With International Practices, Using Croatia As A Case Study. Five Hospitals In Ibadan And Hospitals In Rijeka And Opatija, Croatia, Served As Data Sources. An Online Questionnaire Was Distributed To Medical Practitioners-Physiotherapists, Medical Doctors, Medical Laboratory Scientists And Nurses Across Different Hospitals In The Locations Mentioned Above.A Total Of 101 Responses Were Collected: 51 From Ibadan, Oyo State And 50 From Croatia. In Ibadan, Oyo State, 45.1% Of The Respondents Reported That LBP Occurs More Frequently In Women, While Only 3.9% Said It Is More Common In Men. Occupations Involving Significant Physical Effort Were Identified As A Major Risk Factor, Cited By 27.5% Of Participants. In Addition, 66.7% Of The Respondents Believed That Individuals From Any Profession Could Be Affected. Regarding Diagnostic Tools, 66.7% Of Respondents Confirmed The Availability Of Diagnostic Methods For LBP In Their Hospitals. Knowledge Of Diagnostic Methods Was High For X-Ray(96%), While Fewer Were Aware Of CT Scans (37.3%), Mris (51%), EMG (6%), Blood Tests (6%) Urine Tests (2%), Physical Tests (9.8%) And ESR (2%). The Most Commonly Available Rehabilitation Methods In Ibadan Hospitals Were: Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation(TENS) (66.7%), Kinesitherapy (45.1%), Hydrotherapy( 17.6%), LASER (7.8%), Biofeedback Training (23.5%), Traction (56.9%), Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Translation(PNF) (29.4%), Thermotherapy: (3.9%), Phonophoresis (1.9%), Ergonomics (1.9%) And Others. In Croatia,58.8% Of Respondents Reported LBP As Common Among Both Genders. 24% Reported That LBP Is Mostly Common Among Females And 16% Stated That LBP Is Mostly Occurring In The Male Gender. Comparable To The Data Gathered From The Respondents In Ibadan, 24% Of The Participants Responded That Individuals Engaged In Physically Demanding Occupations Are Mostly Susceptible To Low Back Pain; 16% Reported That Cooperate Workers Are Mostly Susceptible To LBP And 60% Of Respondents Reported That People From Any Kind Of Profession Can Be Susceptible To LBP. 66% Of The Participants Responded Positively To The Availability Of Diagnostic Methods For LBP In Their Places Work; 18% Responded Negatively And An Equivalent Of 18% Also Responded ‘Not Sure’. More Diagnostic Methods Were Reported To Be Available: X-Ray(20%), CT Scan(2%), EMG(8%), Physical Examination(4%),Particularly MRI(62%). Rehabilitation Options Were Also More Extensive, With Kinesitherapy(92%), TENS( 88%), Hydrotherapy (62%), LASER(64%),Traction (34%), PNF (54%), Biofeedback Training (18%), Ultrasound (2%), Proprioceptive Deep Tendon Reflex(PDTF)(2%), Cyriax(2%), Mulligan Therapy (2%). Overall, Hospitals In Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria Lack A Comprehensive And Consistent Rehabilitation Framework For LBP, Falling Short Of International Standards. There Is A Pressing Need For Educational Programmes And Infrastructure Improvements To Align Ibadan’s Rehabilitation Services With Global Practices, Thereby Improving The Chances Of Full Recovery Of Patients Diagnosed With LBP And Ultimately, Enhancing Their Quality Of Life.

Suggested Citation

  • Faith Chinnonye Okere & Verner MarijanÄ ić, 2025. "Rehabilitation of Patients With Low Back Pain in Hospitals in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 12(9), pages 3614-3629, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:9:p:3614-3629
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/uploads/vol-iss-pg3614-3629-202510_pdf.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/article.php?id=362
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:9:p:3614-3629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.