Author
Abstract
The research focused on modifying the traditional siomai recipe by replacing ground pork with young bamboo shoots, aiming to offer a more nutritious and plant-based version. The primary goal was to assess how acceptable different bamboo shoot-to-pork ratios would be in terms of sensory attributes. Methods: This study utilized quantitative research approach using Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with Five variations (T0–T4) were prepared by gradually decreasing the amount of ground pork from 250g to 0g and increasing bamboo shoots from 0g to 250g. Sensory evaluation was conducted among 62 students and 16 faculty-experts, who rated appearance, texture, aroma, and taste using a standardized 9-point hedonic scale. The collected data were subjected to statistical analysis to evaluate differences in responses. Results: All formulations were well-received. Student participants generally gave higher scores than faculty-experts. T4, made entirely with bamboo shoots and no pork, obtained the top ratings across all attributes: appearance (students 8.27; experts 7.88), texture (8.02; 7.56), aroma (7.98; 7.81), and taste (8.16; 7.94). Across treatments, average ratings fell between “Like Very Much†and “Like Extremely.†Although the original (T0) was rated positively, T4 stood out as the most preferred version. Conclusions: Replacing pork with bamboo shoots preserved or improved the product’s sensory qualities. T4 was the most favored, suggesting that bamboo shoots are a viable, health-conscious, and sustainable alternative for siomai production.
Suggested Citation
Arnold S. Baldo & Janette M. Casuco, 2025.
"Bamboo Shoots (Bambusa Vulgaris) Bites: A Flavorful Twist On Siomai,"
International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 12(9), pages 3423-3429, August.
Handle:
RePEc:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:9:p:3423-3429
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:9:p:3423-3429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.