IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjc/journl/v12y2025i9p2934-2939.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sin Reconsidered: A Comparative Study of Classical Theology and Murphy-O’Connor’s Pauline Anthropology

Author

Listed:
  • Mira F. Armia

    (Assumption Antipolo, Maryhill School of Theology, Quezon City)

Abstract

This article presents a comparative theological analysis of classical theology’s conception of sin and Jerome Murphy-O’Connor’s reinterpretation of Pauline anthropology. Classical theology, shaped by figures such as Augustine and Aquinas, traditionally frames sin as an inherited flaw - legalistic, inward, and individualistic - emphasizing moral acts, personal guilt, and the necessity of sacramental remedies. This framework has dominated catechetical instruction and moral theology for centuries, often fostering a pessimistic view of human nature. In contrast, Murphy-O’Connor’s reading of Paul redefines sin as a structural condition rooted in the false value systems of the world. Rather than focusing on individual transgressions, he emphasizes the societal forces that alienate humanity from its authentic self. Authentic existence, according to Murphy-O’Connor, is not achieved through isolated moral acts but through participation in a community modeled on the humanity of Christ. The Christian community, as the Body of Christ, becomes the barrier to sin, empowering individuals to move from “death†(inauthentic existence) to “life†(authentic being). This study employs a comparative framework to highlight the theological, anthropological, and pastoral implications of these two paradigms. It draws on historical sources, doctrinal developments, and Murphy-O’Connor’s pastoral anthropology to explore how communal belonging reshapes moral responsibility. The findings suggest that reframing sin as a structural condition invites a shift in catechesis and religious education from individual moralism to relational ethics rooted in community. This approach fosters a deeper understanding of Christian identity, moral formation, and the liberating power of grace as mediated through authentic relationships. Ultimately, Murphy-O’Connor’s insights offer a hopeful vision of redemption that challenges the pessimism of classical doctrine and affirms the transformative potential of Christian community.

Suggested Citation

  • Mira F. Armia, 2025. "Sin Reconsidered: A Comparative Study of Classical Theology and Murphy-O’Connor’s Pauline Anthropology," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 12(9), pages 2934-2939, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:9:p:2934-2939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/uploads/vol-iss-pg2934-2939-202510_pdf.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/article.php?id=278
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:9:p:2934-2939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.