IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjc/journl/v12y2025i8p2504-2514.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mathematics Anxiety and Types and Frequency of Errors in Algebraic Problem-solving among Grade 12 STEM Students

Author

Listed:
  • Rica Mae B. Jastillana

    (West Visayas State University-Himamaylan City Campus)

  • Ronnel A. Pacionela

    (West Visayas State University-Himamaylan City Campus)

  • Darwin C. Salem

    (West Visayas State University-Himamaylan City Campus)

  • Genesis G. Camarista

    (West Visayas State University-Himamaylan City Campus)

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between mathematics anxiety and the types and frequency of errors in algebraic problem-solving among Grade 12 STEM students in a public school in Himamaylan City during School Year 2025–2026. Using a quantitative descriptive-correlational design, the researchers assessed mathematics anxiety levels via a validated Likert-scale questionnaire and identified error patterns through an eight-item algebraic problem-solving test. Errors were classified as conceptual, procedural, or computational. Descriptive statistics summarized anxiety levels and error frequencies, while Spearman’s rho determined the relationship between anxiety and problem-solving performance. The instruments underwent expert validation and were pilot-tested with non-respondents. The reliability test yielded a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.978, indicating excellent internal consistency. The study involved 30 students from Grade 12 STEM 1, selected through cluster sampling. While this provided valuable insights, the small and single-class sample limits generalizability, which is acknowledged as a study limitation. Results revealed that students generally exhibited moderate to high mathematics anxiety, with female students showing higher anxiety than males. Conceptual errors were most frequent (Occasional), followed by procedural errors (Rare) and computational errors (Never). Students committing conceptual errors reported higher anxiety levels than those with procedural errors, suggesting that deep conceptual misunderstandings may intensify emotional distress. Correlation analysis indicated a weak, non-significant negative relationship between mathematics anxiety and algebraic problem-solving performance (Ï = –0.227, p > 0.05), implying that anxiety alone may not strongly predict performance outcomes. Other factors, such as instructional quality, prior knowledge, and coping strategies, may moderate this relationship. The study recommends enhancing conceptual instruction, integrating anxiety-reduction strategies, and providing targeted support—particularly for female students. Balanced teaching approaches that foster both conceptual understanding and procedural fluency are encouraged. Findings contribute to STEM education research by highlighting the nuanced interplay between affective and cognitive factors in algebra learning and informing interventions aimed at reducing errors and improving performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Rica Mae B. Jastillana & Ronnel A. Pacionela & Darwin C. Salem & Genesis G. Camarista, 2025. "Mathematics Anxiety and Types and Frequency of Errors in Algebraic Problem-solving among Grade 12 STEM Students," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 12(8), pages 2504-2514, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:8:p:2504-2514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/uploads/vol12-iss8-pg2504-2514-202509_pdf.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/article.php?id=235
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:8:p:2504-2514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.