IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjc/journl/v12y2025i6p1535-1556.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Farmer Practices in High Density Banana Production Agronomic Aspects in Taveta County Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Wasilwa, L.W.

    (Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization KALRO)

  • Ndungu, JM..

    (Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization KALRO)

  • Gathambiri C.W.

    (Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization KALRO)

  • Njuguna J.K.

    (Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization KALRO)

  • Kinaga P.

    (Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization KALRO)

  • Rono S.

    (Micro Enterprises Support Programme Trust (MESPT))

  • Karani J.

    (Micro Enterprises Support Programme Trust (MESPT))

  • Amukhoye R.

    (Micro Enterprises Support Programme Trust (MESPT))

  • Rayani J.

    (Micro Enterprises Support Programme Trust (MESPT))

Abstract

The most significant fruit crop in Kenya is the banana, which accounts for 35 percent of total volume (1.08 MT), followed by the mango (17 percent). Recently, Taita Taveta County designated this crop as a priority value chain. In Taita Taveta County’s Taveta Sub-County, banana is becoming more and more popular as a result of market-driven horticultural production intensification and land pressure. This study assesses how well farmer agronomic practices with four spacings of interest (2by 2M, 3 by 4, 3by 3M and 4by4M) adhere to suggested best practices under HDP systems. Data was gathered from 329 farms chosen through the MPEST banana project, secondary data collection, focus groups, direct field observations, and a structured questionnaire. Data was analyzed using SPSS Version 17 to draw up descriptive statistics, (frequency tables, means, and percentages). The results showed that Grand Nain to be frequently grown by farmers in the study subcounty at high planting densities. Significant yield differences were found between high-density planting (2m × 2m) and wider (4m × 4m and 3m × 3m) spacing. During planting, farmyard manure application was significantly (94.7%) higher for the HDP systems compared with the wider spacing (86.1%-90.8%). Irrigation (flood or drip) water was inconsistently scheduled and not correlated to crop evapotranspiration demands under 2m x 2m, 3m x 3m, 4m x 3m, and 4m x 4m as 96.5%, 67.8%, 71.7%, and 90.8%, respectively. Canopy management and desuckering were irregular, with limited understanding of their influence on light interception and plant vigor. In the 2m x 2m, 3m x 3m, 4m x 3m and 4m x 4m spacing’s farmers maintained about 2, 3, 4 and 3 suckers per stool, respectively. The diseases of economic importance are Fusarium wilt and Sigatoka leaf streak disease. The frequent incidence of banana weevil was due to poor field sanitation and inadequate monitoring. Farmers practicing HDP realized higher productivity associated with an increased number of plants and this should be encouraged for spreading to others areas outside the county. The study recommends a strategy to intensify banana production using high-density production systems and in particular with reference to land use efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Wasilwa, L.W. & Ndungu, JM.. & Gathambiri C.W. & Njuguna J.K. & Kinaga P. & Rono S. & Karani J. & Amukhoye R. & Rayani J., 2025. "Evaluation of Farmer Practices in High Density Banana Production Agronomic Aspects in Taveta County Kenya," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 12(6), pages 1535-1556, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:6:p:1535-1556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/digital-library/volume-12-issue-6/1535-1556.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/articles/evaluation-of-farmer-practices-in-high-density-banana-production-agronomic-aspects-in-taveta-county-kenya/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:6:p:1535-1556. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.