IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjc/journl/v12y2025i3p136-150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How are Healthy and Sustainable Workplaces for Professionals with Chronic Diseases?

Author

Listed:
  • Tania Gaspar

    (Universidade Lusófona, HEI-LAB/SPIC, Portugal CHRC/ Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal ISAMB – FM/ Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal Aventura Social – Associação, Portugal Laboratório Português de Ambientes de Trabalho saudáveis/ Portuguese Laboratory for Healthy Workplaces, Lisboa, Portugal)

  • Bárbara de Sousa

    (Universidade Lusófona, HEI-LAB/SPIC, Portugal Aventura Social – Associação, Portugal Laboratório Português de Ambientes de Trabalho saudáveis/ Portuguese Laboratory for Healthy Workplaces, Lisboa, Portugal)

  • José Pais-Ribeiro

    (Laboratório Português de Ambientes de Trabalho saudáveis/ Portuguese Laboratory for Healthy Workplaces, Lisboa, Portugal FPCE/ Universidade do Porto (FPCEUP), Portugal)

Abstract

The economic and sociodemographic challenges arising from the globalisation of work and raising the retirement age should determine a joint effort towards greater protection of the health and safety of workers in the workplace contributing to the achievement of the United Nations SDGs. The main objective of this paper is to understand and characterize the healthy work environment of organizations during the COVID-19 pandemic, and specially better understand the relationship between the dimensions of the healthy work environment and the health situation of the professional (having or not a chronic disease) and its influence of health on work performance. Thus, it is intended to identify positive and negative factors related to healthy workplaces for professionals with chronic disease. Quantitative, cross-sectional and comparative study. It represents a national sample collected in Portugal by the Portuguese Lab for Healthy Workplaces during the years 2022 and 2023.The study involved 4551 participants, 2795 (63,1%) were female. The workers’ age ranged between 18 and 73 years, with a mean of 44.8 years and standard deviation of 10.80, 1349 participants (29.8%) reported having a chronic disease. The Healthy Workplaces Ecosystems Tool was used. Comparing the workers with and without chronic illness in the different dimensions of healthy workplaces, was find that, in general, there are statistically significant differences between the groups. Professionals with a chronic illness report more difficulties and higher risks, with the exception of the telework dimension. Professionals with chronic disease present higher risk behaviours and difficulties in managing stress. Can be concluded that that telework can act as a protective factor for people with chronic diseases, allowing them to reconcile the difficulties caused by the disease with the continuity of the work activity and the support promoted by the work context.

Suggested Citation

  • Tania Gaspar & Bárbara de Sousa & José Pais-Ribeiro, 2025. "How are Healthy and Sustainable Workplaces for Professionals with Chronic Diseases?," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 12(3), pages 136-150, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:3:p:136-150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/digital-library/volume-12-issue-3/136-150.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/articles/how-are-healthy-and-sustainable-workplaces-for-professionals-with-chronic-diseases/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:3:p:136-150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.