Author
Listed:
- SM Ali Ahmed
(Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.)
- Ismet Nigar
(Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.)
- Rehana Razzak Khan
(Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.)
- Ahmed Abu Saleh
(Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.)
- Abu Naser Ibn Sattar
(Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.)
- Sanjida Khandakar Setu
(Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.)
- Chandan Kumar Roy
(Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.)
- Sharmeen Ahmed
(Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.)
- Shaheda Anwar
(Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Department of Microbiology & Immunology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.)
Abstract
Pyogenic infections can be caused by various common microorganisms that require antibiotic therapy. The inappropriate use of antibiotics has resulted in the development of antibiotic resistance. This study aimed to identify bacterial isolates with pus infection and to determine their susceptibility pattern. This retrospective study was conducted in the Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh, between January 2023 and December 2023. 1320 pus samples were collected and all samples were cultured in blood agar and MacConkey agar media. The isolated bacteria were identified by colony morphology, gram staining, and biochemical reactions. Antibiotic susceptibility was tested using the Kirby Bauer disc diffusion method as per the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards guidelines. Among culture-positive cases, the majority 232 (43.78%) were in the age group (21-40) years; male 360 (67.93%) were more commonly affected than female 170 (32.07%) patients. Out of 1320 samples, 530 (40.15%) yielded growth of organisms of which 397 (74.91%) were Gram-negative bacteria, and 133 (25.09%) were Gram-positive bacteria. Klebsiella spp. (31.70%) was the prevailing isolate followed by Staphylococcus aureus (25.09%), Pseudomonas spp. (20.70%), Acinetobacter spp. (10.95%), Proteus spp. (1.70%) and Enterobacter spp. (0.37%). Among gram-negative isolates, most Klebsiella spp. were resistant to amoxicillin (97.62%) followed by Cefuroxime (78.58%), cefotaxime (76.19%), cotrimoxazole (73.21%), and ciprofloxacin (71.42%). The highest sensitivity was exhibited for colistin, which demonstrated 10.72 % resistance among Klebsiella spp., and the least resistant to meropenem (26.79%), same resistance to amikacin and gentamycin (30.96%) and piperacillin-tazobactam (40.47%); respectively. Among gram-positive isolates, staphylococcus aureus was susceptible to linezolid (100%), vancomycin (100%), and cloxacillin (60.15%). They are highly resistant to amoxicillin (93.99%), Erythromycin (77.44%), ciprofloxacin (73.69%), cotrimoxazole (69.93%), and gentamicin (58.65%). These results indicate that the isolation rate from the pus sample was high and the increasing trend of antibiotic resistance in both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria is alarming, which may lead to treatment failure.
Suggested Citation
SM Ali Ahmed & Ismet Nigar & Rehana Razzak Khan & Ahmed Abu Saleh & Abu Naser Ibn Sattar & Sanjida Khandakar Setu & Chandan Kumar Roy & Sharmeen Ahmed & Shaheda Anwar, 2024.
"Retrospective Bacterial Profile in Pus Sample and their Susceptibility Pattern in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh,"
International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 11(9), pages 764-775, September.
Handle:
RePEc:bjc:journl:v:11:y:2024:i:9:p:764-775
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjc:journl:v:11:y:2024:i:9:p:764-775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Renu Malsaria (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrsi/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.