Author
Listed:
- Ram Singh
(University of Lucknow)
Abstract
The effectiveness of adaptive learning platforms in higher education is shaped by multiple interacting factors that involve subjective judgment and uncertainty. This study employs the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (Fuzzy AHP) to examine the relative importance of key evaluation criteria and sub-criteria based on the perceptions of higher education users with prior experience in technology-enabled learning systems. Data were collected through a structured survey of 150 respondents using fuzzy pairwise comparisons. The evaluation framework was structured around four main criteria—Technological Factors, Content Quality, User Factors, and Institutional Support—supported by twelve sub-criteria. The findings show a clear and consistent emphasis on learner-oriented and practical considerations. Within the technological dimension, system usability is ranked as the most influential factor, surpassing platform reliability and internet accessibility. For content quality, content relevance is prioritized over interactivity and multimedia features, highlighting the importance of meaningful and well-structured instructional material. Among user-related factors, learner motivation emerges as the dominant determinant, followed by digital literacy, while engagement level carries comparatively less weight. In the institutional support category, technical support is identified as the most critical element, reflecting the need for timely assistance to ensure uninterrupted platform use. Overall, the results indicate that effective adaptive learning platforms are driven primarily by ease of use, high-quality instructional content, and motivated learners, supported by responsive technical services. The study provides a structured evaluation framework that can assist educators, institutions, and system designers in making informed decisions regarding the development and adoption of learning platforms in higher education contexts.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjb:journl:v:15:y:2026:i:3:p:55-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ijltemas.in/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.