IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bjb/journl/v14y2025i7p215-220.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Level of Agreement in Students' Academic Performance Comparing Kappa and Scott Pi Agreement Measures

Author

Listed:
  • Onyenekwe Chukwuenyem Enoch

    (Department of Statistics, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, PMB 5025, Awka, Nigeria.)

  • Adejumo Olusola Adebowale

    (Department of Statistics, University of Ilorin, PMB 1515, Ilorin, Nigeria.)

Abstract

Kappa and Scott Pi statistics are agreement measures that are used to measure the level of agreement between two raters. The academic performance of students used is the Cumulative Grade Point Average (CGPA) of year one and the final year. Year One is classified as rater one and that of the final year is classified as rater two. The Analysis was done to see the consistency in the students’ performance, if the level of agreement is high, i.e. if there is agreement between their first-year result and that of the final year. A comparison of the Kappa Estimates and that of the Scot Pi was also done to determine the most efficient measure between the two. Kappa Agreement outperforms the Scot pi measures in terms of precision and efficiency. Also, there is no agreement between the Year One Performance and that of the Final Year

Suggested Citation

  • Onyenekwe Chukwuenyem Enoch & Adejumo Olusola Adebowale, 2025. "Measuring Level of Agreement in Students' Academic Performance Comparing Kappa and Scott Pi Agreement Measures," International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science, International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science (IJLTEMAS), vol. 14(7), pages 215-220, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bjb:journl:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:215-220
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ijltemas.in/DigitalLibrary/Vol.14Issue7/215-220.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.ijltemas.in/papers/volume-14-issue-7/215-220.html
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjb:journl:v:14:y:2025:i:7:p:215-220. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ijltemas.in/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.