Author
Abstract
This study presents a high-fidelity Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)-based comparative analysis of passive and active winglet configurations for narrow-body aircraft, focusing on aerodynamic performance, fuel efficiency, and structural trade-offs. While passive winglets are widely implemented due to their simplicity and drag-reduction benefits, active winglets offer adaptive geometry modulation, enhancing performance across various flight phases. Using an Airbus A320-style model, CFD simulations were conducted under standardized cruise conditions to quantify lift (Cl), drag (Cd), and the lift-to-drag ratio (L/D), complemented by scoring for structural complexity and maintenance. The results revealed that the active winglet outperformed the passive configuration, yielding a 10.5% L/D improvement and up to a 6.11% drag reduction during cruise, which translates to fuel savings of 3.87–6.11% across takeoff, cruise, and descent. However, the trade-off analysis highlighted significantly increased structural, actuation, and maintenance demands in active systems. As a solution, a hybrid winglet design—combining passive-flex tips with low-degree-of-freedom actuators—was proposed to balance aerodynamic gains with integration feasibility. The study contributes novel, CFD-driven, regionally contextualized data to sustainable aircraft design, particularly in the context of Southeast Asia’s aviation sector. Limitations include the lack of wind tunnel validation and simplified actuator modeling. Future research should focus on prototyping, aeroelastic simulation, and the integration of AI-based real-time control. The findings offer practical insights for fleet retrofitting and next-generation aerodynamic optimization.
Suggested Citation
Arthur Dela Peña, 2025.
"A CFD-Based Comparative Analysis of Passive and Active Winglets for Narrow-Body Aircraft: Aerodynamic Performance, Fuel Efficiency, And Structural Trade-Offs,"
International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science, International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science (IJLTEMAS), vol. 14(5), pages 966-981, May.
Handle:
RePEc:bjb:journl:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:966-981
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bjb:journl:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:966-981. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Pawan Verma (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.ijltemas.in/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.