IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bit/bsrysr/v9y2018i2p35-44n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Number of Instances for Reliable Feature Ranking in a Given Problem

Author

Listed:
  • Bohanec Marko

    () (Salvirt Ltd.,Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Borštnar Mirjana Kljajić

    () (Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Maribor,Kranj, Slovenia)

  • Robnik-Šikonja Marko

    () (Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana,Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

Background: In practical use of machine learning models, users may add new features to an existing classification model, reflecting their (changed) empirical understanding of a field. New features potentially increase classification accuracy of the model or improve its interpretability. Objectives: We have introduced a guideline for determination of the sample size needed to reliably estimate the impact of a new feature. Methods/Approach: Our approach is based on the feature evaluation measure ReliefF and the bootstrap-based estimation of confidence intervals for feature ranks. Results: We test our approach using real world qualitative business-tobusiness sales forecasting data and two UCI data sets, one with missing values. The results show that new features with a high or a low rank can be detected using a relatively small number of instances, but features ranked near the border of useful features need larger samples to determine their impact. Conclusions: A combination of the feature evaluation measure ReliefF and the bootstrap-based estimation of confidence intervals can be used to reliably estimate the impact of a new feature in a given problem

Suggested Citation

  • Bohanec Marko & Borštnar Mirjana Kljajić & Robnik-Šikonja Marko, 2018. "Number of Instances for Reliable Feature Ranking in a Given Problem," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 35-44, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:bit:bsrysr:v:9:y:2018:i:2:p:35-44:n:4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/bsrj.2018.9.issue-2/bsrj-2018-0017/bsrj-2018-0017.xml?format=INT
    Download Restriction: no

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bit:bsrysr:v:9:y:2018:i:2:p:35-44:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peter Golla). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com/services/journals .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.