IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bit/bsrysr/v5y2014i1p21-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The MODUS Approach to Formal Verification

Author

Listed:
  • Brewka Lukasz

    (DTU Fotonik, Denmark)

  • Soler José

    (DTU Fotonik, Denmark)

  • Berger Michael

    (DTU Fotonik, Denmark)

Abstract

Background: Software reliability is of great importance for the development of embedded systems that are often used in applications that have requirements for safety. Since the life cycle of embedded products is becoming shorter, productivity and quality simultaneously required and closely in the process of providing competitive products Objectives: In relation to this, MODUS (Method and supporting toolset advancing embedded systems quality) project aims to provide small and medium-sized businesses ways to improve their position in the embedded market through a pragmatic and viable solution Methods/Approach: This paper will describe the MODUS project with focus on the technical methodologies that can assist formal verification and formal model checking. Results: Based on automated analysis of the characteristics of the system and by controlling the choice of the existing opensource model verification engines, model verification producing inputs to be fed into these engines. Conclusions: The MODUS approach is aligned with present market needs; the familiarity with tools, the ease of use and compatibility/interoperability remain among the most important criteria when selecting the development environment for a project

Suggested Citation

  • Brewka Lukasz & Soler José & Berger Michael, 2014. "The MODUS Approach to Formal Verification," Business Systems Research, Sciendo, vol. 5(1), pages 21-33, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bit:bsrysr:v:5:y:2014:i:1:p:21-33
    DOI: 10.2478/bsrj-2014-0002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2014-0002
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/bsrj-2014-0002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bit:bsrysr:v:5:y:2014:i:1:p:21-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.