IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bis/bisqtr/0011f.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Size and liquidity of government bond markets

Author

Listed:
  • Robert McCauley
  • Eli Remolona

Abstract

shrinking the fastest in absolute terms, fiscal surpluses in such countries as Australia and Sweden would on present trends eliminate their central government debt ahead of those in the United States (Graph IV.1). At the other end of the spectrum, Japan’s fiscal deficits are producing the world’s biggest government bond market, while those of France and Spain are serving to maintain the size of the euro-denominated market. At the same time, some emerging market countries are having to increase their public sector debt to finance the recapitalisation of distressed banking systems. As different as their fiscal circumstances may be, most governments have revealed a common interest in fostering market liquidity. In pursuing this goal, policymakers have regarded various dimensions of the size of the market as key considerations. In several industrial countries, where budget surpluses are shrinking debt, the authorities are trying to preserve liquidity by maintaining gross issuance in specific securities even as net issuance in all securities declines. The finance ministries in emerging market countries view growing debt as providing an opportunity to develop domestic bond markets – private as well as government – to reduce not only the cost of borrowing but also reliance on overseas financing in foreign currency. After briefly describing the emergence of liquidity in some markets, this article takes up the question of the critical size for a liquid market. It then discusses one way of creating size: through lumping together different types of debt. Next it characterises the trade-off between size and crowding-out. Finally, it raises some issues concerning the transition in growing and shrinking markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert McCauley & Eli Remolona, 2000. "Size and liquidity of government bond markets," BIS Quarterly Review, Bank for International Settlements, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:bis:bisqtr:0011f
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bis.org/publ/r_qt0011f.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.bis.org/publ/r_qt0011f.htm
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bis:bisqtr:0011f. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christian Beslmeisl (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bisssch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.