IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bin/bpeajo/v55y2024i2024-02p59-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Did the Federal Reserve's 2020 Policy Framework Limit Its Response to Inflation? Evidence and Implications for the Framework Review

Author

Listed:
  • Christina D. Romer

    (University of California, Berkeley)

  • David H. Romer

    (University of California, Berkeley)

Abstract

We analyze monetary policy documents to examine what role the new policy framework adopted by the Federal Reserve in 2020 and its implementation played in the slow response of policy to the inflation of 2021-2022. We show that the two changes that are most explicit in the new framework - moving to flexible average inflation targeting and not responding to employment above its "maximum" level - had little impact. However, two changes that were more subtle - moving away from preemptive policy actions and, especially, strengthening and elevating the employment side of the dual mandate - played significant roles. We conclude by discussing implications for the Federal Reserve's upcoming framework review.

Suggested Citation

  • Christina D. Romer & David H. Romer, 2024. "Did the Federal Reserve's 2020 Policy Framework Limit Its Response to Inflation? Evidence and Implications for the Framework Review," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Economic Studies Program, The Brookings Institution, vol. 55(2 (Fall)), pages 59-87.
    • Handle: RePEc:bin:bpeajo:v:55:y:2024:i:2024-02:p:59-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-federal-reserves-monetary-policy-framework-review/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bin:bpeajo:v:55:y:2024:i:2024-02:p:59-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Haowen Chen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/esbrous.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.