IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bhx/ojtjfs/v7y2025i2p64-82id3387.html

Comparative Assessment of Consumer Preferences and Sensory Attributes of GAP and Non-GAP Greenhouse Tomatoes among Urban Consumers in Mogadishu, Somalia

Author

Listed:
  • Asho Adan Mohamed

  • Abdullahi Farah Ahmed

  • Ibrahim Jamal Ahmed

  • Naimo Ibrahim Mohamed

  • Yasin Sheikh Amir Sheikh Ibrahim

  • Abdiwahab Abdullahi Ibrahim

  • Abdimajid Ahmed Mohamed

  • Abdisalam Abdikarim Mohamed

  • Ismacil Muhidin Abdullahi

Abstract

Purpose: In Mogadishu, Somalia, the cultivation of tomatoes in greenhouses is rapidly gaining popularity as farmers strive to improve both yield and quality. Despite this trend, there is limited understanding of consumer perceptions regarding tomatoes grown using Good Agricultural Practices (GAP) compared to those produced through traditional, non-GAP methods. This study assessed the sensory qualities and consumer preferences for tomatoes from both farming techniques. Methodology: This study evaluated the sensory attributes and consumer acceptability of tomatoes from both production systems. A Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with two treatments (GAP vs. non-GAP) was applied. Thirty untrained panelists rated appearance, aroma, flavor, texture, and overall acceptability on a five-point hedonic scale (1 = dislike a lot - 5 = like a lot). Data were analyzed using Minitab v.19. Paired t-tests and Wilcoxon Signed-Rank tests were applied to ensure robustness of the findings. Findings: The findings revealed that tomatoes grown with GAP received higher scores than non-GAP tomatoes in terms of appearance (4.27 ± 0.86 versus 4.01 ± 0.94), aroma (4.06 ± 0.96 compared to 3.76 ± 1.02), flavor (4.04 ± 1.04 against 3.68 ± 1.12), and overall acceptability (4.21 ± 0.94 as opposed to 3.96 ± 1.12) (all p < 0.001). No notable difference in texture was observed between the two types. The Pearson correlation showed strong positive associations among the sensory attributes, especially between flavor and overall acceptability (r = 0.647). Panelists were also more willing to pay a higher price for GAP tomatoes, with an average price difference of 0.84 USD (p < 0.001), suggesting a perception of superior quality. Unique Contribution Theory, Policy and Practice: Overall, the results indicate that implementing GAP enhances key sensory attributes and increases consumer satisfaction. The study recommends that tomato growers in Mogadishu adopt GAP to improve product quality and competitiveness. Additionally, policymakers and extension services should support GAP training and awareness programs to promote sustainable, market-oriented tomato production in Somalia.

Suggested Citation

  • Asho Adan Mohamed & Abdullahi Farah Ahmed & Ibrahim Jamal Ahmed & Naimo Ibrahim Mohamed & Yasin Sheikh Amir Sheikh Ibrahim & Abdiwahab Abdullahi Ibrahim & Abdimajid Ahmed Mohamed & Abdisalam Abdikarim, 2025. "Comparative Assessment of Consumer Preferences and Sensory Attributes of GAP and Non-GAP Greenhouse Tomatoes among Urban Consumers in Mogadishu, Somalia," Journal of Food Sciences, CARI Journals Limited, vol. 7(2), pages 64-82.
  • Handle: RePEc:bhx:ojtjfs:v:7:y:2025:i:2:p:64-82:id:3387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://carijournals.org/journals/JFS/article/view/3387
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bhx:ojtjfs:v:7:y:2025:i:2:p:64-82:id:3387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://carijournals.org/journals/JFS/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.