IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bhx/ojtjep/v8y2024i3p1-25id1917.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teaching Quality Care for Healthcare Professionals: Delphi Consensus on Designing Drama

Author

Listed:
  • Heba M. Nageh
  • Samar E. Abdelraouf
  • Samia M. Abd El-Mouty

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to design drama for teaching quality care for healthcare professionals based on the newest evidence for continuous professional development and confront challenges for teaching healthcare professionals through multimedia that shift the trend in education from instructive to constructivist learning. Methodology: This study was conducted through a three-round stepwise Delphi consensus on a judgmental sample of expert panelists. The researchers identified the expert panelists' demographic and professional characteristics, studied the views and expectations of designing drama for teaching quality care, and appraised the designed drama with a self-administered structured questionnaire and a scale, respectively. Findings: Study results revealed that expert panelists achieved consensus on several items concerning the drama's content and design. The expert panelists' appraisals of the internal validity and consistency of the designed drama were (p≤0.05) and (0.767) as measured by the Pearson correlation test and Cronbach α, respectively. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice, and Policy: The researchers conclude that expert panelists recommend applying drama in teaching, and with in-depth discussion, they verbalize how drama can improve educational outcomes. The researchers recommend adopting and disseminating the designed drama for teaching healthcare professionals' quality care and instilling drama in teaching curricula to address the gap between theoretical study and what is faced in real fields.

Suggested Citation

  • Heba M. Nageh & Samar E. Abdelraouf & Samia M. Abd El-Mouty, 2024. "Teaching Quality Care for Healthcare Professionals: Delphi Consensus on Designing Drama," Journal of Education and Practice, CARI Journals Limited, vol. 8(3), pages 1-25.
    • Handle: RePEc:bhx:ojtjep:v:8:y:2024:i:3:p:1-25:id:1917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.carijournals.org/journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/1917/2288
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bhx:ojtjep:v:8:y:2024:i:3:p:1-25:id:1917. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.carijournals.org/journals/index.php/JEP/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.