Author
Listed:
- Daniel Nyukuri Kwoba
- James Mucunu Mbaria
- Isaac Mpapuluu Mapenay
- Irene Thiguku Kamanja
- John Nduhiu Gitahi
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the long-term influence of the training on aflatoxin levels. Methodology: In this study a comparison in aflatoxin levels was made between farms where training had been done against those that were not. The samples from 30 farms where training had been done and 30 other farms where training was not done were analyzed. Findings: The overall mean total aflatoxin levels were 0.5464 ±0.16124 and 1.1034 ±2.4849 ppb respectively. Despite the low mean total aflatoxin levels, the analysis of the aflatoxin levels between farms where training had been done and farms where training was not done, showed no significant difference with p >0.05. One of the maize samples out of the 60 farms analyzed had a total aflatoxin level of 14.23ppb. There were also numerous samples whose moisture content exceeded the regulatory limits. Additionally, population dynamic and change in attitude had influenced the six year-long term impact of the training. A further comparison between agricultural training and most of the detoxifying methods in use, gives preference to the training over routine decontamination methods as a preventive measure. Therefore, other than wait to detoxify the contaminated maize using the costly methods which hardly remove all the toxins, regular farm trainings are recommended, precisely every planting season to improve consistence in Good Agricultural Practice application and hence aflatoxin mitigation. Unique Contribution to Theory and Policy: This study comprises of the theory of planned behavior, which takes into consideration the quick farm income obtained from tea farming that changed the attitude of some farmers.
Suggested Citation
Daniel Nyukuri Kwoba & James Mucunu Mbaria & Isaac Mpapuluu Mapenay & Irene Thiguku Kamanja & John Nduhiu Gitahi, 2025.
"The Long-Term Influence of Agricultural Training on Aflatoxin Levels in Selected Maize Farms in Nandi County, Kenya,"
Journal of Agricultural Policy, CARI Journals Limited, vol. 8(2), pages 30-45.
Handle:
RePEc:bhx:ojtjap:v:8:y:2025:i:2:p:30-45:id:2898
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bhx:ojtjap:v:8:y:2025:i:2:p:30-45:id:2898. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.carijournals.org/journals/index.php/JAP/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.