IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bhx/ojjepm/v10y2025i2p33-46id2853.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Benchmarking Evaluation Approaches on the Performance of Housing Projects in Nairobi

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriel Wasonga Jabongo

Abstract

Purpose: The study purpose is to determine the influence of benchmarking evaluation approaches on the performance of housing projects in Nairobi. Projects, including construction, aim to meet diverse stakeholder needs and are evaluated based on quality, time, and cost. The Project Management Institute (PMI) asserts that successful projects must be completed within budget, on schedule, and to the desired quality. Globally, many struggle to meet these benchmarks. Benchmarking evaluation approaches significantly influence housing project performance, yet their absence often leads to inefficiencies, cost overruns, delays, and quality issues. This study assessed the impact of benchmarking on housing projects in Nairobi, guided by Construction Management Theory. Methodology: A descriptive research design was used, targeting 127 projects by 15 real estate developers between 2019–2024. Data were collected from 254 registered architects using structured questionnaires and analyzed using SPSS to generate descriptive and inferential statistics. Findings: Findings indicate strong organizational commitment to benchmarking, which positively influences project performance, decision-making, and strategic planning. However, barriers such as limited training, system integration issues, and weak policy influence hinder full adoption. Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: The study recommends the alignment of bench marking evaluation approaches with Kenya’s affordable housing program and international standards (e.g., UN-Habitat guidelines).

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriel Wasonga Jabongo, 2025. "Influence of Benchmarking Evaluation Approaches on the Performance of Housing Projects in Nairobi," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Project Management, CARI Journals Limited, vol. 10(2), pages 33-46.
    • Handle: RePEc:bhx:ojjepm:v:10:y:2025:i:2:p:33-46:id:2853
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://carijournals.org/journals/index.php/JEPM/article/view/2853
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bhx:ojjepm:v:10:y:2025:i:2:p:33-46:id:2853. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://carijournals.org/journals/index.php/JEPM/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.