IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bhx/ojjbsm/v10y2025i14p44-62id3246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geopolitics and Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review of Firm Responses to the U.S.–China Trade War

Author

Listed:
  • Haram Lee

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to systematically examine how the U.S.–China trade war has shaped firm-level innovation activities. It identifies key risk factors triggered by geopolitical tensions, analyzes firm-level responses, and evaluates long-term strategic shifts in innovation and industrial strategies. Methodology: The study employed a systematic literature review (SLR) approach following established guidelines for transparent and replicable synthesis. A structured search across ScienceDirect, JSTOR, and Emerald databases was conducted using Boolean keyword combinations related to the trade war and innovation. A total of sixteen empirical studies were identified and analyzed descriptively, focusing on theoretical mechanisms, empirical findings, and contextual variations. Findings: The review finds that the trade war introduced substantial trade policy uncertainty (TPU), producing heterogeneous impacts across firms and sectors. Financially constrained and export-dependent firms reduced R&D and experienced declines in patent quality, while larger firms and those with state support increased innovation. Common adaptive responses included geographic diversification of R&D, ESG-driven innovation, and the pursuit of indigenous technologies. TPU thus functions not only as a constraint but also as a conditional driver of “precautionary innovation” aimed at reducing foreign dependence and securing long-term competitiveness. Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: This study provides one of the first systematic syntheses of firm-level innovation responses to the U.S.–China trade war. It contributes to theory by framing trade policy uncertainty as both a deterrent and a stimulus to innovation. For policymakers, it highlights the importance of coordinated industrial policies that enhance resilience and technological self-reliance. For practitioners, it offers insights into how firms can transform external shocks into opportunities for long-term strategic adaptation and innovation-led competitiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Haram Lee, 2025. "Geopolitics and Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review of Firm Responses to the U.S.–China Trade War," Journal of Business and Strategic Management, CARI Journals Limited, vol. 10(14), pages 44-62.
  • Handle: RePEc:bhx:ojjbsm:v:10:y:2025:i:14:p:44-62:id:3246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://carijournals.org/journals/JBSM/article/view/3246
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bhx:ojjbsm:v:10:y:2025:i:14:p:44-62:id:3246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://carijournals.org/journals/JBSM/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.