Author
Listed:
- Emmanuel Lwanga Kayongo
- Dr Benson B. Okech
Abstract
Purpose: This study explores the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) of Boda Boda riders within the framework of ongoing reform and change management, employing insights from ADKAR and Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model to evaluate their readiness and barriers to behavioural change. Methodology: A mixed-methods, cross-sectional design was used, combining structured questionnaires (n = 475) with key informant interviews from stakeholders such as the Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA), Ministry of Works and Transport (MoWT), and Boda Boda associations. Quantitative data were analysed using SPSS (version 20), employing descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and bivariate regression. Qualitative data were thematically coded using Atlas.ti (version 8). Methodological rigour was maintained through triangulation, with high reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.903) and content validity (CVI = 0.970) of the instruments. Findings: Findings reveal that riders possess moderate knowledge (M = 3.021) and show openness to reform, yet actual safety and service delivery practices remain inconsistent. Helmet usage (M = 2.80), adherence to traffic laws (M = 2.83), and digital platform engagement are notably weak. KAP was found to be a weak but statistically significant predictor of service delivery outcomes (r = 0.364, p < .001; Adjusted R² = 0.130). Qualitative data highlighted institutional mistrust, financial constraints, and resistance to safety gear as persistent barriers. Unique Contribution to Theory, Policy and Practice: The study concludes that closing the knowledge-practice gap requires more than just awareness. Change must be supported through participatory governance, behavioural nudges, and context-sensitive regulation. Future interventions should institutionalize peer-led mentorship, digital literacy programmes, and culturally responsive safety innovations. Further research is recommended to explore gendered KAP dynamics, longitudinal impacts of digital tools, and the role of informal associations in enabling sustainable reform.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bhx:ojjbsm:v:10:y:2025:i:13:p:1-15:id:3130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.carijournals.org/journals/index.php/JBSM/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.