Author
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this article was to analyze cultural perceptions of gender roles and their influence on career choices in religious communities in United Kingdom. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: Cultural perceptions of gender roles in religious communities in the UK strongly influence career choices. Women are often expected to prioritize family over career, limiting their professional aspirations, especially in conservative religious groups. Men, on the other hand, are typically encouraged to pursue leadership and high-status careers. However, there is a growing shift, with more women entering the workforce, particularly in fields like healthcare and education. This reflects the tension between traditional gender norms and modern career opportunities in religious settings. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Social role theory, cultural capital theory & expectancy theory expectancy may be used to anchor future studies on the cultural perceptions of gender roles and their influence on career choices in religious communities in United Kingdom. In practice, religious communities can take concrete steps to create environments that support equal career opportunities for men and women. From a policy perspective, religious institutions can implement gender-inclusive policies that promote equality in career choices.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bhx:oijcrs:v:6:y:2025:i:1:p:26-36:id:3118. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.carijournals.org/journals/index.php/IJCRS/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.