Judicial Sentencing Disparities: A Study of the Influence of Socioeconomic Status in Ethiopia

Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the judicial sentencing disparities: a study of the influence of socioeconomic status in Ethiopia. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: It reveals a significant correlation between SES and the severity of sentences handed down by the judiciary. Individuals from lower socioeconomic backgrounds tend to receive harsher punishments compared to their wealthier counterparts for similar offenses. This phenomenon persists across various jurisdictions and highlights systemic inequalities within the criminal justice system. Factors such as access to legal representation, education, and community support systems contribute to these disparities. The findings underscore the pressing need for reforms aimed at addressing socioeconomic disparities in sentencing to ensure fairness and equity in the administration of justice. Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Social conflict theory, labeling theory and intersectionality theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the judicial sentencing disparities: a study of the influence of socioeconomic status in Ethiopia. Provide ongoing training for judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, and other legal stakeholders on recognizing and mitigating implicit biases related to SES. Review and reform sentencing guidelines to minimize the influence of socioeconomic factors on sentencing outcomes.