IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bfy/ojtajl/v4y2022i2p1-19id1226.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of the Land Use Act on Land Tenural System in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Prof. Damfebo K Derri
  • Josephine Nkeonye Egemonu

Abstract

Purpose: Before the advent of the Land Use Act in 1978, individuals, families and communities owned land absolutely according to customary law. Thus, the family or community was free to give out their land to deserving members of the family or community or even to outsiders as the case may be. Where an individual was the absolute owner of the land, he was free to deal with it in any manner he liked. Therefore, the individual, family or community exercised all incidents of ownership without restrictions. All these were altered when the Land Use Act was promulgated. The extent to which this Act affected the existing land tenural system in Nigeria is discussed in this article. This article critically analyses the land tenure system under both conventional land law and customary land tenure in Nigeria. Methodology: Applying doctrinal research methodology, it uses some available resources in some Nigerian libraries, both online and offline. Findings: It concluded that the provisions of the Land Use Act have severe consequences on land tenural system in Nigeria. Recommendations: In view of the challenges highlighted in the Act, this article recommends among other things that the State Governors need to improve and quicken the process of issuing certificates of occupancy and payment of adequate compensation after revocation of tittle to land to forestall unnecessary litigation and that there should be a land reform that recognizes the rights of individuals or communities to land either freehold (indefinite absolutely) or for a relatively long-term duration. This will ensure a genuine free market economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Prof. Damfebo K Derri & Josephine Nkeonye Egemonu, 2022. "Impact of the Land Use Act on Land Tenural System in Nigeria," American Journal of Law, AJPO, vol. 4(2), pages 1-19.
  • Handle: RePEc:bfy:ojtajl:v:4:y:2022:i:2:p:1-19:id:1226
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ajpojournals.org/journals/index.php/AJL/article/view/1226/1339
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bfy:ojtajl:v:4:y:2022:i:2:p:1-19:id:1226. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ajpojournals.org/journals/index.php/AJL/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.