Author
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the role of communication styles in workplace conflict resolution in Brazil. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: The role of communication styles in workplace conflict resolution is paramount, as it significantly influences the outcome and the overall workplace environment. The study indicates that individuals with different communication styles tend to approach conflicts differently, impacting the resolution process. For instance, individuals with assertive communication styles often address conflicts directly, expressing their needs and concerns clearly while respecting others' viewpoints. This approach fosters open dialogue and promotes understanding, leading to effective resolution. On the other hand, individuals with passive communication styles may avoid confrontation, leading to unresolved conflicts or simmering tensions. Meanwhile, those with aggressive communication styles may resort to dominating or intimidating tactics, escalating conflicts rather than resolving them. Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Communication accommodation theory, social identity theory and transactional model of communication may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the role of communication styles in workplace conflict resolution in Brazil. Develop practical guidelines for communication skills training programs aimed at improving conflict resolution. Advocate for the inclusion of communication style considerations in organizational conflict resolution policies.
Suggested Citation
Bete Mendes, 2024.
"Role of Communication Styles in Workplace Conflict Resolution in Brazil,"
American Journal of Communication, AJPO Journals Limited, vol. 6(2), pages 22-31.
Handle:
RePEc:bfy:ojtajc:v:6:y:2024:i:2:p:22-31:id:1935
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bfy:ojtajc:v:6:y:2024:i:2:p:22-31:id:1935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ajpojournals.org/journals/index.php/AJC/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.