IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bfy/ojtajc/v6y2024i1p56-66id1932.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Social Media Usage on Political Polarization in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Jack Daniel

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the impact of social media usage on political polarization in the United States. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: The study revealed that social media platforms tend to create echo chambers and filter bubbles, where users are exposed to information and opinions that align with their existing beliefs, reinforcing their views and increasing polarization. Algorithms designed to maximize user engagement often prioritize content that is sensational or controversial, further exacerbating this effect. Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Selective exposure theory, social identity theory and echo chamber effect may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the impact of social media usage on political polarization in the United States. Educational institutions and media organizations should collaborate to implement comprehensive media literacy programs. Policymakers should consider regulatory measures to address algorithmic biases and ensure transparency in the curation of social media content.

Suggested Citation

  • Jack Daniel, 2024. "Impact of Social Media Usage on Political Polarization in the United States," American Journal of Communication, AJPO Journals Limited, vol. 6(1), pages 56-66.
  • Handle: RePEc:bfy:ojtajc:v:6:y:2024:i:1:p:56-66:id:1932
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ajpojournals.org/journals/index.php/AJC/article/view/1932/2260
    Download Restriction: Access to full texts is restricted to American Journal of Communication
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bfy:ojtajc:v:6:y:2024:i:1:p:56-66:id:1932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ajpojournals.org/journals/index.php/AJC/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.