Author
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess gendered impacts of climate change adaptation policies coastal communities. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: The study indicated that women and men experience climate change impacts differently due to existing societal norms and roles. In many coastal areas, women often have distinct responsibilities related to household management, food security, and caregiving, making them particularly vulnerable to the effects of climate change. Adaptation policies often fail to adequately consider these gender dynamics, leading to unequal distribution of resources and opportunities for women. Additionally, traditional gender roles may limit women's participation in decision-making processes related to adaptation strategies, further exacerbating their vulnerability. Efforts to address gender disparities in climate adaptation policies are crucial for promoting resilience and sustainability in coastal communities. Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Feminist political ecology, environmental justice and social capital theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing gendered impacts of climate change adaptation policies coastal communities. Implement capacity-building initiatives to raise awareness among policymakers, practitioners, and community members about the gendered dimensions of climate change adaptation. Advocate for the development and implementation of gender-responsive climate change adaptation policies at the local, national, and European Union levels.
Suggested Citation
Jabulani Malinga, 2024.
"Gendered Impacts of Climate Change Adaptation Policies Coastal Communities,"
European Journal of Gender Studies, AJPO, vol. 6(1), pages 45-56.
Handle:
RePEc:bfy:ojejgs:v:6:y:2024:i:1:p:45-56:id:1959
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bfy:ojejgs:v:6:y:2024:i:1:p:45-56:id:1959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ajpojournals.org/journals/index.php/EJGS/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.