Author
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess gender disparities in leadership positions in Asia. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: The study indicated that women are consistently underrepresented in top leadership roles across various sectors, including corporate, political, and academic domains. The study revealed numerous factors contributing to this gap, including implicit bias, gender stereotypes, lack of mentorship opportunities, and work-life balance challenges. Additionally, cultural and institutional barriers hinder women's advancement, such as the glass ceiling phenomenon and the scarcity of family-friendly policies in workplaces. While progress has been made in recent years, with initiatives aimed at promoting gender equality and diversity in leadership, persistent disparities underscore the need for continued efforts to address systemic barriers and foster inclusive environments that empower women to pursue and thrive in leadership roles. Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Social role theory, glass ceiling theory and implicit bias theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the gender disparities in leadership positions in Asia. Implement diversity and inclusion training programs to raise awareness of unconscious biases and promote gender-neutral decision-making processes in leadership selection, promotion, and performance evaluation. Advocate for legislative measures to promote gender diversity on corporate boards and executive teams, such as quotas or disclosure requirements, to accelerate progress towards gender-balanced leadership representation.
Suggested Citation
Keiko Akira, 2024.
"Gender Disparities in Leadership Positions in Asia,"
European Journal of Gender Studies, AJPO, vol. 6(1), pages 24-33.
Handle:
RePEc:bfy:ojejgs:v:6:y:2024:i:1:p:24-33:id:1957
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bfy:ojejgs:v:6:y:2024:i:1:p:24-33:id:1957. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ajpojournals.org/journals/index.php/EJGS/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.