Author
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to assess the assessment of welfare indicators in farmed rabbits fed different diets. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: The study revealed that rabbits fed diets rich in fiber and nutrients exhibited better physiological markers, including improved digestive health and reduced instances of gastrointestinal disorders. Additionally, behavioral observations suggested that rabbits on specific diets displayed more natural and active behaviors, indicating higher levels of welfare. Furthermore, health assessments revealed fewer instances of illness and improved overall condition in rabbits consuming certain dietary formulations. These findings underscore the importance of dietary management in promoting optimal welfare for farmed rabbits, with implications for industry practices aimed at enhancing animal well-being. Implications to Theory, Practice and Policy: Optimal foraging theory, stress theory and homeostasis theory may be used to anchor future studies on assessing the assessment of welfare indicators in farmed rabbits fed different diets. Practical recommendations should emphasize the implementation of evidence-based dietary strategies tailored to meet the specific welfare needs of rabbits in different production systems. Policy recommendations should focus on integrating welfare considerations into regulatory frameworks and industry standards for rabbit production
Suggested Citation
Charlie Robinson, 2024.
"Assessment of Welfare Indicators in Farmed Rabbits Fed Different Diets,"
European Journal of Animal Health, AJPO, vol. 5(1), pages 1-11.
Handle:
RePEc:bfy:ojejah:v:5:y:2024:i:1:p:1-11:id:1967
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bfy:ojejah:v:5:y:2024:i:1:p:1-11:id:1967. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ajpojournals.org/journals/index.php/EJAH/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.