Author
Listed:
- Lucy Chegem Lolem
- Vallence Ngabo
- Prudence Kemigisha
- Viola N Nyakato
Abstract
Purpose: This study explores how cultural context moderates the relationship between community engagement, integration, and livelihood outcomes in wildlife conservation among the Karimojong people near Kidepo Valley National Park, Uganda. Materials and Methods: A convergent parallel mixed-methods design combined quantitative surveys with qualitative interviews. Data were collected through structured questionnaires from 243 Karimojong community members, five Key Informant Interviews with officials and wildlife authorities, and five Focus Group Discussions with Local Council 1 members. Quantitative data were analyzed using Stata 17, and qualitative data were thematically analyzed using NVivo 14. A moderated mediation analysis was conducted using PROCESS Macro (Model 14). Findings: Community engagement significantly predicted integration (B = 0.83, p < .001), which positively influenced livelihood outcomes (B = 0.92, p = .0005). Cultural context directly predicted livelihoods (B = 0.97, p < .001) and moderated the integration–livelihood relationship (B = –0.20, p = .035), indicating that integration’s positive effects diminish in stronger cultural settings. The indirect effect of engagement on livelihoods through integration was more potent at low (B = 0.60) and medium (B = 0.37) cultural levels, but negligible at high levels (B = 0.05). However, the index of moderated mediation was not statistically significant. Qualitative findings supported these results, revealing that cultural exclusion and marginalization hinder integration and reduce livelihood benefits. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Future research should consider cultural dynamics as key moderators in conservation models. Conservation programs should adopt culturally sensitive approaches that promote inclusive decision-making and empower Indigenous communities to enhance integration and livelihood outcomes.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bfy:ojajes:v:8:y:2025:i:1:p:53-66:id:2700. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ajpojournals.org/journals/index.php/AJES/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.