IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ben/ttebsp/v3y2016i2p119-130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bayesian MCMC Analysis on R&D Investment of Biotech Start-up in the ‘Valley of Death’

Author

Listed:
  • Takao Fujiwara

    (Institute of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Toyohashi University of Technology, Toyohashi, Japan)

Abstract

In addition to many need-pull innovations, a type of rare basic-research-push innovation is biopharmaceutical development. In reflecting next generation innovation, the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (NBI) is actually moving stronger in comparison with other indicators. From the industry’s high dependence on basic research, biotech start-up, which is more excellent in combing breakthrough technologies and niche markets than the mass market and low risk-oriented large pharmaceutical companies are expected as a major driver of the innovation chain. However, from the prolonging period of pharmaceutical development, expansion of necessary investment, low possibility of success, and severe resource constraints, a drug discovery-based biotech start-up must endure the ‘Valley of Death’ as a long-term deficit state in addition to the high bankruptcy rate. Why can a biotech start-up that suffers from long-term deficits even in the financial crisis continue research and development investment? If so, what kind of criteria for investment can be utilized? Biotech start-up is defined as the portfolio of real options. As methodologies, this paper applies the real options concept to the assessment of the stockholders’ equity as technological potential and Bayesian MCMC to the parameter estimation between the net income, shareholders' equity value, and R&D costs of representative 30 companies in the NBI.

Suggested Citation

  • Takao Fujiwara, 2016. "Bayesian MCMC Analysis on R&D Investment of Biotech Start-up in the ‘Valley of Death’," Technology Transfer and Entrepreneurship, Bentham Science Publishers, vol. 3(2), pages 119-130, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ben:ttebsp:v:3:y:2016:i:2:p:119-130
    DOI: 10.2174/2213809903666160714112610
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eurekaselect.com/143955/article
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2174/2213809903666160714112610?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ben:ttebsp:v:3:y:2016:i:2:p:119-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rehana Raza (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.